Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant  x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o
Check the appropriate box:
o  Preliminary Proxy Statement
 
o  Confidential, for Use of Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x  Definitive Proxy Statement
  
o  Definitive Additional Materials
  
o  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12
  
Delta Apparel, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
xNo fee required.
oFee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

______________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

oFee paid previously with preliminary materials
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule  0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:

(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:



Table of Contents



Table of Contents





DELTA APPAREL, INC.
322 S. Main Street
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
Telephone (864) 232-5200
September 28, 201123, 2013



To Our Shareholders:
On behalf of the Board of Directors, Delta Apparel, Inc. invites you to attend the 20112013 Annual Meeting of the shareholders of Delta Apparel, Inc. on Thursday, November 10, 20117, 2013. The Annual Meeting will be held at our administrative offices located at 2750 Premiere Parkway, Suite 100, Duluth, Georgia. 30097. The Annual Meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. local time.
The attached Proxy Statement describes the matters that we expect to act upon at the Annual Meeting. If you were a shareholder of record as of the close of businessSeptember 13, 2013, you are entitled to vote on September 16, 2011, you will find enclosed a proxy card and an envelope in which to return the card.these matters. Your vote is very important. Whether or notIf you planare unable to attend the meeting, please complete, sign, datevote by proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by completing the enclosed proxy card and return your enclosed proxysigning, dating and returning the card at your earliest convenience. ThisVoting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy card will ensure representation of your common sharesrepresentation at the Annual Meeting ifregardless of whether you attend in person. If you attend the Annual Meeting and desire to revoke your proxy and vote in person, you may do so. In any event, you are unableentitled to attend.revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised.
We appreciate your continued support of Delta Apparel, Inc.
Sincerely,
Robert W. Humphreys
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents



Table of Contents


DELTA APPAREL, INC.
322 S. Main Street
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
Telephone (864) 232-5200

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
November 10, 20117, 2013

It is my pleasure to invite you to attend the 20112013 Annual Meeting of the shareholders (the "Annual"2013 Annual Meeting") of Delta Apparel, Inc. ("Delta Apparel" or the(the "Company"), a Georgia corporation, on Thursday,, November 10, 20117, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. local time. The meeting will be held at our administrative offices located at 2750 Premiere Parkway, Suite 100, Duluth, Georgia 30097.
30097. At the 2013 Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote on the following matters, which are further described in the attached proxy statement (the "Proxy Statement"):
1.
Election of the eight nominees named in the Proxy Statement to the Board of Directors to serve until the 2012Company's next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
2.Re-approval of the Company's Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan;
3.Advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers;
4.3.Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers;
5.
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm ("independent auditors") for theour 2014 fiscal year ending June 30, 2012;
year; and
6.4.Action upon such other matters, if any, as may properly come before the meeting.
All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Shareholders of record at the closeas of business on September 16, 201113, 2013, are entitled to vote at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
MarthaJustin M. WatsonGrow
Secretary
September 28, 201123, 2013
Greenville, South Carolina


WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING, PLEASE EITHER VOTE VIA THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE, OR SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
* * * * * *
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on November 7, 2013: The Delta Apparel, Inc. Proxy Statement For The 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Delta Apparel, Inc. 2013 Annual Report are Available at www.deltaapparelinc.com.
* * * * * *


Table of Contents




TABLE OF CONTENTS

Questions and Answers About the 2013 Annual Meeting and Voting
5
1
Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors
8
5
Proposal No. 2: Re-Approval of Short-Term IncentiveAdvisory Vote on Executive Compensation Plan
10
9
Proposal No. 3: Advisory Vote on NEO Compensation
11
Proposal No. 4: Advisory Vote on Frequency of Advisory Vote on NEO Compensation
12
Proposal No. 5: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
11
13Report of the Audit Committee
12
Corporate Governance
15
13
Stock Ownership of Management and Principal Shareholders and Management
21
19
Executive Officers
23
Compensation Committee Report
24
22
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
24
23
Summary Compensation Table
33
35
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
33
36
Outstanding Equity Awards Table
35
37
Option Exercises
35
38
Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or Change in Control Table
38
36Compensation Committee Report
40
Director Compensation
38
41
Equity Compensation Plan Information
39
Audit Committee Report
41
42
Additional Information
42
Appendix A: Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
X
43










[This page intentionally left blank]

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
November 10, 2011
ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on November 10, 2011:
This Proxy Statement and proxy voting card are being mailed to holders of Delta Apparel, Inc. common stock beginning on or about September 23, 2013. On behalf of our Board of Directors, we are soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of the Company's common stock at our 2013 Annual Meeting and all adjournments or postponements of such meeting. We solicit proxies to provide all shareholders of record with an opportunity to vote on matters to be presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting. The information provided in this Proxy Statement is intended to assist you in voting your shares on these matters. This Proxy Statement and our 20112013 Annual Report are available at no charge on our internet website at www.deltaapparelinc.com.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2013 ANNUAL MEETING
What is the purpose of the 2013 Annual Meeting?
At the 2013 Annual Meeting, theour shareholders will act upon the matters outlined in the Notice of Annual Meeting on the first page of Shareholders in this Proxy Statement, including the election of the eight nominees as directors, the re-approval of the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, an advisory vote on the compensation of theour named executive officers, an advisory vote on the frequencyratification of the advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers, and the ratificationappointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as theour independent auditors. Such proxy may also be voted by the persons named in the proxy in their discretion uponregistered public accounting firm for our 2014 fiscal year, and such other business as may be properly brought before the meeting.2013 Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement and form of proxy were first mailed to shareholders on or about September 28, 2011.

Where will the 2013 Annual Meeting be held?
The 20112013 Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, November 10, 20117, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. local time at our administrative offices located at 2750 Premiere Parkway, Suite 100, Duluth, Georgia 3009730097..

Who can attend the 2013 Annual Meeting?
All of our shareholders are invited to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting. Only Delta Apparel, Inc. shareholders as of the close of business on Friday, September 16, 201113, 2013 (the "Record Date"), may attendvote at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Who is soliciting my vote?
The Company'sOur Board of Directors (the "Board") is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

What am I voting on?
You are voting on fivethree proposals:
1.
The election of the following eight nominees to the Board of Directors to serve until the 2012Company's next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
 James A. Cochran Robert W. Humphreys 
 Sam P. Cortez E. Erwin Maddrey, IIDavid T. Peterson 
 Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood David T. PetersonSuzanne B. Rudy 
 Dr. G. Jay Gogue Robert E. Staton, Sr. 
2.The re-approvalAn advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan;our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement; and
3.Advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers;
4.Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers; and
5.Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP ("E&Y")to serve as our independent auditors.registered public accounting firm for our 2014 fiscal year.

What are the voting recommendations of the Board?
The Board recommends the following votes:
1.FOR each of the eight director nominees to the Board ("Proposal No. 1");
2.FOR the re-approvalapproval of the Company's Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plancompensation of our named executive officers ("Proposal No. 2"); and
3.FOR the approval of the compensation of the company's named executive officers ("Proposal No. 3");

5
Table of Contents

4.FOR the approval of an annual shareholder advisory vote on the approval of the compensation of the Company's named executive officers ("Proposal No. 4"); and
5.
FOR the ratification of the appointment of E&YErnst & Young LLP to serve as our independent auditorsregistered public accounting firm for theour 2014 fiscal year ending June 30, 2012("Proposal No. 5"3").

Will any other matters be voted on?
The Board does not intend to present any other matters at the 2013 Annual Meeting and we do not know of any other matters that will be brought before the shareholders for a vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the 2013

1
Table of Contents

Annual Meeting, your signed proxy card gives authority to the persons named in the proxy to vote on such matters in their discretion and in accordance towith their best judgment.

Who is entitled to vote?
Only shareholdersHolders of record atour common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date, will be entitled toSeptember 13, 2013, may vote at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Meeting, either in person or by proxy.
How many votes do I have?
You will have one vote for every share of Delta Apparel, Inc. common stock that you owned at the close of business on the Record Date. You do not have the right to cumulate your votes with respect to the election of any director.

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
Many shareholders hold their shares through a broker or bank rather than directly in their own names. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
Shareholder of Record
Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company's transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by the Company.
Beneficial Owner
Owner. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your bank or broker, which is considered the shareholder of record of these shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank or broker how to vote, and are also invited to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting. However, sinceif you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the 2013 Annual Meeting unless you bring with you a legal proxy from the shareholder of record. Your bank or broker has enclosedshould enclose a voting card for you to use for providing directions for how to vote your shares.

How do I vote?
If you are a shareholder of record, there are four ways to vote:
1.By internet at www.proxyvote.com;
2.By toll-free telephone at 1-800-690-6903;
3.By completing and mailing your proxy card; or
4.By written ballot at the 2013 Annual Meeting.
The internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to confirm your identity, to allow you to provide your voting instructions and to verify that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you wish to vote by internet or telephone, please follow the instructions that are printed on the enclosed proxy card. If you vote by internet or telephone, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. local time on November 9, 20116, 2013, the day before the 2013 Annual Meeting. Your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you sign and return your proxy card but you do not indicate your voting preferences, the proxies will vote your shares FOR Proposal No.Nos. 1, 2 3 and 5,3. Although we are not currently aware of any other matters that will be brought before the 2013 Annual Meeting, by signing and FOR an ANNUALreturning your proxy card you appoint the persons named as proxies as your representatives at the 2013 Annual Meeting. If a matter is raised for a vote on Proposal No. 4.at the 2013 Annual Meeting that is not included in these proxy materials, then the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.
If your shares are held in street name, you should follow the voting directions provided by your bank or broker. You may complete and mail a voting instruction card to your bank or broker or, in most cases, submit voting instructions by the internet or telephone to your bank or broker. If you provide specific voting instructions by mail, the internet or telephone, your shares should be voted by your bank or broker as you have directed. AS A RESULT OF THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE'SNYSE MKT'S RULES, YOUR BANK OR BROKER CANNOT VOTE WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL NOS. 1 2, 3 OR 42 UNLESS IT RECEIVES VOTING INSTRUCTIONS FROM YOU.
We will distribute written ballots at the 2013 Annual Meeting to any shareholder of record who wants to vote. If you hold your shares in street name, you must request a legal proxy from your bank or broker to vote in person at the 2013 Annual Meeting.


6
Table of Contents

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy any time before the 2013 Annual Meeting by:
1.Entering a new vote by internet or telephone;
2.Returning a later-dated proxy card;

2
Table of Contents

3.
Sending written notice of revocation to MarthaJustin M. Watson, CorporateGrow, Secretary, at the Company's address of record, which is 322 S. Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601; or
4.Completing a written ballot at the 2013 Annual Meeting.
Attendance at the 2013 Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy.
If your shares are held in street name, you must follow the specific directions provided to you by your bank or broker to change or revoke any instructions you have already provided to your bank or broker.

How are votes counted?
Votes are counted by inspectors of election designated by the Corporateour Secretary.

Who pays for soliciting proxies?
We will pay for the cost of preparing, assembling, printing and mailing this Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxymaterials to our shareholders, as well as the cost of soliciting proxies relating to the meeting. In addition, we will reimburse banks and brokers for their reasonable charges and expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the shares held in street name. Delta Apparel'sOur officers, directors and employees may, without additional compensation, supplement these solicitations of proxies by telephone, facsimile, email and personal solicitation.

What is the quorum requirement of the 2013 Annual Meeting?
ATo conduct the 2013 Annual Meeting, a majority of the outstanding shares of Delta Apparelthe Company's common stock on the Record Date, representedentitled to vote must be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, constitutes a quorum for voting on proposals at the2013 Annual Meeting. This is referred to as a "quorum." If you vote, your shares will be partconsidered present at the 2013 Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted in determining the presence or absence of a quorum. On the Record Date, there were 8,514,6207,873,848 shares outstanding and 1,020970 shareholders of record. A majority of Delta Apparelthe Company's common stock, or 4,257,3103,936,925 shares, will constitute a quorum.

What are broker non-votes?
Broker non-votes occur when holders of record, such as banks and brokers holding shares on behalf of beneficial owners, do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owners by the date specified in the statement requesting voting instructions that has been provided by the bank or broker.
If that happens, the bank or broker may vote those shares only on matters as permitted by the NYSE MKT's rules and regulations. The New York Stock Exchange. The New York Stock ExchangeNYSE MKT prohibits banks and brokers from voting uninstructed shares in the election of directors and in matters related to executive compensation; accordingly, banks and brokers cannot vote with respect to Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 3 or 4 unless they receive voting instructions from the beneficial owners. Banks and brokers can vote on Proposal No. 5 even if they receive no voting instructions from beneficial owners. Broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of Proposal Nos. 1 2, 3, 4 and 52 being voted on at the 2013 Annual Meeting, assuming that a quorum is obtained.

What vote is required to approve each proposal?
Proposal No. 1: For the election of directors, the eight nominees for director will be elected if they receive an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes castshares present at the Annual Meetingmeeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote for the election of directors.directors at the 2013 Annual Meeting. For purposes of the election of directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of votes castshares means that the number of shares voted "FOR" a director's election exceeds the number of votes withheld from a director's election. Votes cast exclude broker non-votes and abstentions, and therefore broker non-votes and abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors.
Proposal No. 2: Re-approval of the Company's Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan requires that the number of votes cast "FOR" exceeds the number of votes cast against this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote with respect to this proposal.
Proposal No. 3: For the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company'sour named executive officers, the vote is non-bindingnot binding on our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee and, therefore, no specific vote is required to approve the proposal. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results and consider them in making future decisions about executive compensation.
Proposal No. 4: For the advisory vote on how often shareholders will be given the opportunity to vote on the compensation of

7
Table of Contents

the Company's named executive officers, the vote is non-binding and, therefore, no specific vote is required to approve the proposal. However, the Board will consider the voting results in making the decision on the frequency3: Ratification of the shareholder vote on executive compensation, and the Company will report the Board's final intent in the Report on Form 8-K that reports the resultsappointment of the voting at the Annual Meeting.
Proposal No. 5: Ratification of E&YErnst & Young LLP to serve as the Company'sour independent auditorregistered public accounting firm requires that the number of votes cast "FOR" exceeds the number of votes cast against this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote with respect to this proposal.proposal
Are the Company's proxy materials available on the internet?
Yes, this Proxy Statement and our 2013 Annual Report are available without charge on our website at www.deltaapparelinc.com.


3
Table of Contents

Where can I find the voting results of the 2013 Annual Meeting?
We will announce the preliminary voting results at the 2013 Annual Meeting and will publish final results in a current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on or before November 16, 2011.11, 2013. This Form 8-K will be available without charge to shareholders upon written request to Investor Relations Department, Delta Apparel, Inc., 322 S. Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601 or via the internet at www.deltaapparelinc.com.

What is the deadline for consideration of shareholder proposals or director nominations for the 2012next annual meeting of shareholders?
If you are a shareholder and you want to present a proposal at the 2012 annual meeting and have it included in the Company's proxy statement for that meeting, you must submit the proposal in writing at the Company's offices at 322 S. Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601, Attention: Corporate Secretary, on or before May 31, 2012. Applicable Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"(“SEC”) rules and regulations govern the submission of shareholder proposals and the Company's consideration of them for inclusion in next year's proxy statement.
  The Company has changed its fiscal year end such that the 2014 fiscal year will now end on September 27, 2014.  The Company anticipates that its annual meeting following the 2014 fiscal year end will be on a date more than 30 days after the date of the 2013 annual meeting.  As such, if you want to submit a proposal for inclusion in next year's proxy statement, proposals must be received by the Company a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials.  The Company currently expects it will print and send its proxy materials for the annual meeting following its 2014 fiscal year end on or about December 18, 2014.  The Company believes a reasonable time for submissions to be received by the Company would be 120 days prior to printing and mailing of its proxy materials.  This deadline will also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of exercising discretionary authority with respect to proxies for purposes of Rule 14a-4(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  If you want to present a proposal at the 2012fiscal year 2014 annual meeting of shareholders (but not have the proposal included in the Company's proxy statement) or to nominate a person for election as a director,, you must comply with the advance written notification and other requirements set forth in Delta Apparel's by-laws. You must giveour Bylaws, including having the proposal received by the Company at least 60 days'not later than July 9, 2014.  In addition, nominations for the election of directors must comply with the advance written notice (or 120 days' advance written noticenotification and other requirements set forth in our Bylaws, which provide that in the caseevent the date of a director nomination),the annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days from the date of the previous years' annual meeting, then nominations must be received by the Company not later than 10 days after notice or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders for the election of directors.  This notice will be included in our Notice of Annual Meeting and that notice must meet certain requirements described inProxy Statement for the by-laws.fiscal year 2014 annual meeting of shareholders.     




























84
Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Each of the Company’sour directors brings extensive management and leadership experience gained through his or her service to diverse businesses. The Board membersbusinesses and institutions. Our directors are committed to effectively oversee management’s performance, to act in the long-term best interests of shareholders and to maintain the highest standards of corporate governance.
Delta Apparel's bylawsOur Bylaws provide that the number of directors to be elected at any meeting of shareholders will be between two and fifteen, and will otherwise be determined by the Board of Directors. TheOur Board of Directors has determined that eight directors shall be nominated for election at the 2013 Annual Meeting.
The eight personsindividuals listed below are nominees for election as directors at the 2013 Annual Meeting to serve until our next Annual Meetingannual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified:
James A. Cochran
Sam P. Cortez
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood
Dr. G. Jay Gogue
Robert W. Humphreys
E. Erwin Maddrey, II
David T. Peterson
Robert E. Staton, Sr.
Background information onqualified. Each of the nominees including somewas elected by the shareholders at our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders. Included in each nominee's biography below is a description of the qualifications, experience, attributes and skills of such nominee that led our Board to conclude that he or she is well qualified to serve as a member of the Board for our 2014 fiscal year and until the Company's next annual meeting of shareholders or until their selection, is set forth in "Corporate Governance - Board of Directors". Thesuccessors are duly elected and qualified.
Our Board's Corporate Governance Committee has affirmatively determined that with the exception of Robert W. Humphreys, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, each directorof the nominees qualifies as "independent" under NYSE MKT corporate governance listing standards and also meets the Company's director qualification standards, which are described in the "Corporate Governance” section entitled “Director Nominations”.of this Proxy Statement. We believe that all of the nominees will be available and able to serve as directors.
Unless you vote “Withheld”“Withhold” with respect to a particular nominee or all nominees, the proxy holders will vote your shares “FOR” each of the nominees listed above.below. In the event that any nominee is not available or able to serve, the Board of Directors may either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the proxy holders will vote your shares for the substitute nominee, unless you have withheld authority.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE EIGHT NOMINEES.
James A. Cochran
Director Since: 2008    Age: 66     Committees: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee
Mr. Cochran has served as Chief Financial Officer of Greenway Medical Technologies, Inc., a provider of software solutions for healthcare providers, since 2009. Previously, he was Senior Vice President responsible for Investor Relations and Corporate Strategies of TurboChef Technologies, Inc., a provider of equipment, technology and services for high-speed food preparation, and served in that capacity from 2007 until 2009. From 2003 until 2007, Mr. Cochran also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TurboChef Technologies, Inc. He is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Cochran's broad and diverse professional knowledge base, including public accounting, mergers and acquisitions, investor relations, corporate strategy and financial management in public and private enterprises, provides the Board with valuable leadership and insight into these disciplines.
Sam P. Cortez
Director Since: 2010    Age: 50     Committees: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee
Mr. Cortez has been the principal of KCL Development LLC, a provider of corporate finance and advisory services, since 2003. Prior to 2003, he was employed in the investment banking industry, including Lehman Brothers, Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette, Alex Brown & Sons, and Morgan Stanley International. Mr. Cortez serves as a director of Hancock Fabrics, Inc. and as chairman of its Management Review and Compensation Committee and is a member of its Audit and Governance Committees. He was formerly a director of World Waste Technologies, Inc., a development stage technology company, from 2005 to 2009, and served as chairman of its Audit Committee and as a member of its Compensation and Finance Committees. Mr. Cortez's experience includes mergers and acquisitions, strategy development, financing transactions and spin-offs. In addition to investment banking activities, he has served on boards and committees of private, public and not-for-profit organizations. Mr. Cortez recently earned the National Association of Corporate Directors' Board Leadership Fellow designation. His intimate knowledge of financial markets and strategic transactions brings a depth of knowledge in these areas to our Board.

5
Table of Contents

Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood
Director Since: 2007    Age: 68     Committees: Audit Committee; Corporate Governance Committee
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood is the Associate Director of the Wake Forest University Center for Enterprise Research and Education, a position to which she was appointed in July 2010. From July 2008 to July 2012, she served as Director of the Wake Forest University NSF Partners for Innovation Program. From 2004 until July 2010, she served as Director of the Office of Entrepreneurship & Liberal Arts at Wake Forest University. Previously, she served as the Jack M. Gill Chair of Entrepreneurship and Director of The Johnson Center for Entrepreneurship & Innovation at Indiana University from 1998 to 2004. Prior to her appointment at Indiana University, Dr. Gatewood was the Executive Director of the Gulf Coast Small Business Development Center Network at the University of Houston. Dr. Gatewood's academic background includes advanced business degrees in finance and business strategy. Her career has focused on entrepreneurship, growth strategies and small business education and development. She has extensive exposure to business development and models in international developing economies. Dr. Gatewood's perspectives on strategy, development and entrepreneurship bring unique insight to Board discussions.
Dr. G. Jay Gogue
Director Since: 2010    Age: 65     Committees: Audit Committee
Dr. Gogue is President of Auburn University, a position he has held since 2007. He served as President of the University of Houston and Chancellor of the University of Houston System from 2003 to 2007. Prior to serving at the University of Houston, he was President of New Mexico State University from 2000 to 2003 and Provost of Utah State University from 1995 to 2000. Dr. Gogue began his career in higher education administration in 1986 as Associate Director of the Office of University Research at Clemson University, where he also served as Vice President for research and Vice President and Vice Provost for agriculture and natural resources. Dr. Gogue has served as an accreditation reviewer for the Pacific Northwest Association of Schools and Colleges, Commission on Colleges. His leadership of large educational institutions has involved development of strategic plans, operating under difficult budgetary constraints and balancing the needs of diverse stakeholders including students, faculty, alumni and state government. Dr. Gogue's wealth of experience managing large and complex organizations provides our Board with valuable input and expertise.
Robert W. Humphreys
Director Since: 1999    Age: 56     Committees: None
Mr. Humphreys is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Delta Apparel, Inc. He was named Chairman of our Board in June 2009. Mr. Humphreys previously served Delta Apparel, Inc. as President and Chief Executive Officer for more than 10 years. From April 1999 until December 1999 Mr. Humphreys served as President of the Delta Apparel division of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. In May 1998, he was named Vice President of Finance and Assistant Secretary of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. and served in that capacity until November 1999. From January 1987 to May 1998, Mr. Humphreys served as President of Stevcoknit Fabrics Company, the former knit fabrics division of a subsidiary of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. Mr. Humphreys has over 25 years of experience in the textile and apparel industry, including senior leadership roles in operations and finance. Under his direction Delta Apparel has grown from a commodity t-shirt manufacturer to a diverse, branded apparel company. Mr. Humphreys' long history with the Company, combined with his leadership skills and operating experience, makes him particularly well-suited to be our Chairman and serve on our Board.
David T. Peterson
Director Since: 2003    Age: 62     Committees: Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance Committee
Mr. Peterson serves as Chairman Emeritus of The North Highland Company, a management and technology consulting services firm based in Atlanta, Georgia. Mr. Peterson founded The North Highland Company in 1992 and served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until 2005 and as Chairman from 2005 until 2012. Mr. Peterson has more than 30 years of business experience that includes assisting large multinational enterprises, entrepreneurial businesses, medium-sized organizations, and non-profits in improving their businesses. He has consulted for a wide variety of industries ranging from aerospace and defense to medical equipment to telecommunications.Previously, he held management positions with Georgia-Pacific Corporation, a manufacturing company, and both Ernst & Young, LLP and Arthur Andersen & Co., which are accounting and consulting firms. He serves on a number of non-profit and for-profit boards and currently serves on the board of the Georgia Center for Non-Profits, and the Rotary Club of Buckhead. Mr. Peterson brings to our Board expertise in business development and improvement strategies.

6
Table of Contents

Suzanne B. Rudy
Director Since: 2012    Age: 58     Committees: Audit Committee
Ms. Rudy is Vice President, Corporate Treasurer, Compliance Officer and Assistant Secretary of RF Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:RFMD), a publicly traded company and leading supplier of semiconductor solutions for the wireless communications market. In addition to her treasury and compliance duties, Ms. Rudy is a director for all twelve subsidiaries of RFMD. Prior to joining RF Micro Devices, Inc. in 1999, Ms. Rudy was the Controller for Precision Fabrics Group, Inc., a textile spin-off of the Fortune 500 Company, Burlington Industries. In addition, she spent six years as a CPA and Manager for BDO Seidman, LLP, an international CPA firm. From 2008 through 2010, she served as a director and chaired the Audit, Assets and Liability Committee of First National Bank United Corporation and also served on its Investment Committee. Ms. Rudy currently serves on the Board of Visitors for Guilford College. Ms. Rudy is currently a National Association of Corporate Directors Board Leadership Fellow, having completed the NACD's program for corporate directors. Ms. Rudy brings to our Board extensive expertise in public company financial, compliance and related strategic matters.
Robert E. Staton, Sr.
Director Since: 2009    Age: 67     Committees: Corporate Governance Committee; Compensation Committee
Until recently, Mr. Staton served as the Chief of Staff at Presbyterian College, a position he had held since July 2011. Mr. Staton currently provides business development consulting services to Coleman Lew + Associates, an executive search and leadership development firm. He served as Executive Vice President of External Relations at Presbyterian College from 2006 until July 2011. In 2002, Mr. Staton was named Chairman of the Board of Carolina National Bank until its acquisition by First National Bank of the South in 2008. From 1986 until 2002, Mr. Staton served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Life, a publicly traded company primarily in the business of selling and servicing voluntary benefits programs. Mr. Staton served as a director of First National Bankshares and was a director of First National Bank of the South from 2008 until July 2010. Mr. Staton holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of South Carolina School of Law. Mr. Staton has extensive professional experience in legal matters and senior executive positions with financial companies, as well as service as the chairman of a public company. Additionally, he has served on numerous boards and committees of public, private and civic, educational and other organizations. The knowledge and insight gained from this diverse experience contribute greatly to the Board.




97
Table of Contents











[This page intentionally left blank]








8
Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 2
RE-APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY'S SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
On June 28, 2000, the Board of Directors adopted the Delta Apparel, Inc. Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan”) and the shareholders subsequently approved the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. On November 8, 2007 the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan was re-approved by the shareholders. Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan must be re-approved by the shareholders every five years for compensation paid pursuant to the plan to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
On September 15, 2011, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation from the Compensation Committee, re-approved the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. No amendments were made to the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.
The complete text of the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan is attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement. The following description of the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan is a summary of certain terms and is qualified entirely by reference to Exhibit A.

Summary of the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan

Purpose. The purpose of the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan is to recognize and reward employees who contribute substantially to the achievement of the Company's short-term, strategic objectives that will enhance shareholder value.

Administration. The Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee has broad authority to administer and interpret the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and its provisions as it deems appropriate, subject to the express provisions of the Plan. All actions taken by the Compensation Committee under the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding.

Eligibility. All employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are potentially eligible to participate in the Short-Term Incentive Plan, however, only employees specifically selected by the Compensation Committee participate in the Plan for any performance period. There are approximately 490 employees, including all executive officers of the Company, currently eligible to participate in the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.

Performance Objectives. Not later than 90 days after the commencement of a performance period (and in any event prior to the date when twenty-five percent (25%) of the performance period has elapsed), the Compensation Committee establishes in writing one or more performance goals for the performance period and the formula or method for determining the amount of compensation payable to the applicable participants if the performance goal is met. Performance goals are based on one or more of the following performance criteria: (i) total stockholder return; (ii) revenues, sales, net income, EBIT, EBITDA, stock price, and/or earnings per share; (iii) return on assets, net assets, and/or capital; (iv) return on stockholders' equity; debt/equity ratio; (v) working capital; (vi) safety; (vii) quality; (viii) our company's financial performance or the performance of our stock versus peers; (ix) cost reduction; (x) productivity; (xi) market mix; or (xii) economic value added, in each case determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Performance goals may be based on either the performance of the Company over the performance period or, if the participant is employed by a subsidiary or division of the Company during the performance period, the performance during the performance period of such subsidiary or division. The Compensation Committee may establish different performance goals, and may base performance goals on different performance criteria, for different participants and/or different classes of participants. Each performance goal established must be an objective goal (meaning that a third party having knowledge of the relevant facts would be able to determine whether the performance goal has been met).

Payments. Prior to the commencement of the performance period, the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, designates the total bonus target amount for the performance period and approves the bonus target amounts for the executive officers participating in the Plan for the period. Regardless of the formula or method established by our Compensation Committee, no participant will be entitled to receive compensation pursuant to the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan in excess of $1,500,000 during any calendar year. No payment under the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan will be made to any participant unless and until the Compensation Committee certifies in writing that the relevant performance goal(s) and any other material preconditions to such payment were in fact satisfied. All payments under the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan will be in cash.

Termination of Employment. No participant will be entitled to any payment under the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan with respect to a performance period if the participant at any time during the performance period is not an employee of either the Company or one of its subsidiaries, except that, unless the Compensation Committee provides otherwise in writing, if the participant ceases to be an employee of either the Company or one of its subsidiaries during the performance period due to the participant's retirement (provided that the participant is at least age 62), death or permanent and total disability, the participant will be entitled

10
Table of Contents

to a pro rata portion of the payment, if any, that the participant would have been entitled to had the participant remained employed until the end of the performance period by the Company or one of its subsidiaries, based on the portion of the performance period during which the participant was an employee.

Amendment and Termination. Generally, the Board may at any time, with or without notice, amend, suspend or terminate the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, provided that no amendment that would require shareholder approval in order for payments under the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan to be deductible by the Company pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code will be effective without such shareholder approval.

Federal Income Tax Considerations. Generally, the Company will be entitled to a tax deduction for awards under the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan only to the extent that the executives recognize ordinary income from the award. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code contains special rules regarding the federal income tax deductibility of compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and to each of our other four other most highly compensated executive officers (other than our Chief Executive Officer). The general rule is that annual compensation paid to any of these specified executives will be deductible only to the extent that it does not exceed $1,000,000 or it qualifies as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m). The Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan has been designed to permit the Compensation Committee to grant awards, which qualify for deductibility under Section 162(m).

Program Benefits. Because the exact participants under the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan are determined on an annual basis, the precise number, name or positions of persons who will receive awards or the amount of such awards is not determinable at this time. However, as described above, the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan has been in place since 2000. The amounts payable pursuant to the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan relating to performance in the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011 for the following individuals and groups were as follows:
Name and Position Amount
Robert W. Humphreys, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer $835,625
Deborah H. Merrill, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 200,550
Martha M. Watson, Vice President and Secretary 133,700
Steven E. Cochran, President of Delta Activewear 653,735
Kenneth D. Spires, President of M.J. Soffe, LLC 175,025
All Current Executive Officers (5 people) 1,998,635
Non-Executive Director Group —
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group 6,512,845
In addition, each of the executives contained in the above table have been selected as participants for fiscal year 2012 and it is anticipated that at least these executives will be selected as participants on an annual basis going forward. For fiscal year 2012, the Compensation Committee made changes to the performance goals. The performance goals for the awards based on the performance of the Company as a whole include 75% of the target amount based on return of capital employed (as defined as the Company's earnings before interest and taxes as a percentage of the twelve month average capital employed) and 25% of the target amount based on the three-year average earnings per share growth. This total is then adjusted for the sales growth or decline from the prior year sales. In addition to the performance goals based on the performance of the Company as a whole, Mr. Cochran and Mr. Spires receive a portion of their target value based on the performance of their particular business unit (Delta Activewear and M.J. Soffe, LLC, respectively). For fiscal year 2012, the performance goals for the Delta Activewear and M.J. Soffe, LLC business units are based one-third each on sales growth over the prior year, return on capital employed, and operating profit margin. For all awards in fiscal year 2012, whether based on the performance of the Company as a whole or based on the results of a business unit, there is no guaranteed payment amount. In addition, if performance goals are exceeded, there is a maximum bonus payout of 250% of the participant's target value.
A copy of the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE COMPANY'S SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN.


11
Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 3
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") requires all publicly-traded companies to hold a shareholder advisory vote on the executive compensation of ourits named executive officers, (as listed herein under "Executive Officers"), otherwise known as a "Say-on-Pay". We ask vote. The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors is committed to creating an executive compensation program that enables us to attract, retain, and motivate outstanding and diverse executives. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews all of our executive compensation programs to ensure that they continue to reflect our commitment to align the objectives and rewards of our executive officers with the creation of value for our shareholders. The programs have been designed to reinforce our pay-for-performance philosophy by delivering total compensation that motivates and rewards short and long-term financial performance to maximize shareholder value. At the same time, we believe our compensation programs are appropriately measured and do not encourage excessive risk-taking by our executive team. Our Board believes that our philosophy and compensation practices strike the appropriate balance between utilizing responsible pay practices and effectively motivating our executives to dedicate themselves to the interests of our shareholders.
For these reasons, the Board requests that you approve the Company's executive compensation ofpolicies and practices for our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement, including the Compensation DisclosureDiscussion and Analysis, sectionthe executive compensation tables and the accompanying tables contained in this Proxy Statement.narrative discussions. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on our Board, our Compensation Committee, or the Company, and we will not be required to take any action as a result of the outcome of the vote on this proposal. However, the Compensation Committee will carefully consider the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation arrangements.
Our Compensation Committee is committed to creating an executive compensation program that enables us to attract, retain, and motivate outstanding and diverse executives. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews all of our executive compensation programs to ensure that they continue to reflect Delta Apparel's commitment to align the objectives and rewards of our executive officers with the creation of value for our shareholders. The programs have been designed to reinforce our pay-for-performance philosophy by delivering total compensation that motivates and rewards short and long-term financial performance to maximize shareholder value. At the same time, we believe our compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk-taking by our executive team. The Board believes that our philosophy and compensation practices strike the appropriate balance between utilizing responsible measured pay practices and effectively motivating our executives to dedicate themselves fully to value creation for our shareholders.
For these reasons, the Board requests that you approve the Company's executive compensation policies and practices for our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the SEC disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the executive compensation tables and narrative discussions.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE COMPANY'S POLICIES AND PRACTICES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FOR OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.



129
Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 4
ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF FUTURE
ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Dodd-Frank Act also requires all publicly-traded companies to provide shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on whether future advisory votes on the executive compensation of our named executive officers should occur every year, every two years, or every three years.
The Board believes that "Say-on-Pay" votes should be conducted every year so that shareholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation philosophy and practices. The option of one year, two years, or three years that receives the most votes by shareholders will be deemed the preferred frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by the shareholders. Although this is an advisory vote and is non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee welcomes shareholder input on their preference as to the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE TO HOLD FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION EVERY "ONE" YEAR.







[This page intentionally left blank]

1310
Table of Contents

PROPOSAL NO. 53
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The firmIn accordance with the requirements of our Audit Committee's charter, each year our Audit Committee evaluates and considers the qualifications, performance and independence of our external auditors. Based on its evaluation, the Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP has been retained by our Audit Committee("E&Y") to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for theour 2014 fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting the Company’s independent auditors. Accordingly, shareholder approval is not required to appoint E&Y as our independent auditor for fiscal year 2012. Our Board believes, however, that submitting the appointment of E&Y to the shareholders for approval is a matter of good corporate governance.year. E&Y audited the Company’sour financial statements for fiscal year 20112013 and has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2001.
Although our Bylaws do not require that shareholders ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, our Board believes that submitting the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm for shareholder ratification at the 2013 Annual Meeting is appropriate from a corporate governance perspective. In the event that our shareholders do not ratify the appointment of E&Y, our Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment (but is not required to appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm). Even if the appointment is ratified, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the fiscal year if our Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the Company’s best interests and the best interests of our shareholders.
Representatives of E&Y will be present at the 2013 Annual Meeting and such representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR OUR 2014 FISCAL YEAR.
The following table presentssets forth the fees billed for professional audit services rendered by E&Y for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended July 2, 2011June 29, 2013, and July 3, 2010,June 30, 2012, and the fees billed for other services rendered by E&Y duringwith respect to those periods.
2011 201020132012
Audit Fees$703,763
 $737,684
$711,590
 $712,800
 
Audit-Related Fees30,000
 13,500
7,500
 362,950
 
All Other Fees4,615
 1,765
—
 2,115
 
Total$738,378
 $752,949
$719,090
 $1,077,865
(1)
(1) At the time of the filing of our Proxy Statement for our 2012 fiscal year we had not received a final bill for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. At that time, our independent registered public accounting firm estimated that we would be billed $1,208,850 for professional services rendered for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
Audit Fees—Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our fiscal year 20112013 and fiscal year 20102012 consolidated annual financial statements, audit of internal control over financial reporting for fiscal years 20112013 and 20102012, review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, and services that are normally provided by E&Y in connection with SEC filings.
Audit-Related Fees—Consists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements but are not reported under “Audit Fees.” For fiscal years 2011 and 2010,year 2012, $400,000 of such fees primarily related to E&Y’s performanceinvolvement in the independent investigation by the Audit Committee into the fiscal year-end financial closing processes utilized in our Activewear division, which was previously disclosed in connection with the September 12, 2012, Form 12b-25 we filed with the SEC, and $10,000 of opening balance sheet audits for TCX, LLC and Art Gun, LLC, respectively.such fees related to E&Y’s services provided in connection with the previously disclosed inventory write-down taken by the Company in the second quarter of fiscal year 2012.
All Other Fees—For fiscal yearsyear 2011 and 20102012, the fees were for an annual subscription for E&Y’s web-based accounting research service.
In the event that our shareholders fail to ratify the selection of E&Y,Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
It is our Audit Committee will reconsider the selection (but is not requiredCommittee's policy to select a differentpre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services proposed to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm). Even if the selectionfirm. The pre-approval process is ratified, ourtypically as follows: Audit Committee pre-approval is sought at one of the Committee’s regularly scheduled meetings following the presentation of information at such meeting detailing the particular services proposed to be performed. The authority to pre-approve non-audit services may be delegated by the Audit Committee, pursuant to guidelines approved by the Committee, to one or more members of the Committee or management. The Committee has delegated to our Chief Financial Officer the authority to pre-approve non-audit services in an amount of up to $10,000.




11
Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in its discretion, may appoint a differentoversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent accountants and the performance of the internal audit function. The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors who meet independence, experience and other qualification requirements of the NYSE MKT and the SEC. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Dr. G. Jay Gogue qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined by SEC rules and regulations.
Management is responsible for our financial reporting process, including our internal control over financial reporting, and for the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our independent accountants are responsible for expressing an opinion on the financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, based on an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to oversee and review these processes. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made by management and the independent registered public accounting firm atfirm.
The Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:
1.
The Audit Committee appointed E&Y as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2013.
2.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended June 29, 2013, and the internal controls over financial reporting as of June 29, 2013, with the Company’s management.
3.
The Audit Committee has discussed with E&Y the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees.
4.
The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from E&Y required pursuant to Rule 3526 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and has discussed with E&Y its independence from the Company.
In determining E&Y’s independence, the Committee also considered whether the provision of any time duringof the non-audit services provided to the Company is compatible with maintaining their independence. The Committee received regular updates on E&Y’s fees and the scope of audit and non-audit services it provided. All such services were provided consistent with applicable rules and our pre-approval policies and procedures.
Based on our discussions with management, our internal auditors and E&Y, and our review of the audited financial statements, including the representations of management and E&Y with respect thereto, and subject in all cases to the limitations on our role and responsibilities referred to above and set forth in our charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company's audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year if our Audit Committee believes that such a change wouldended June 29, 2013, be included in the Company’s best interests and the best interests of our shareholders.Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Representatives of E&Y will be present at the Annual Meeting and such representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2012.AUDIT COMMITTEE:
Dr. G. Jay Gogue (Chairperson)
James A. Cochran
Sam P. Cortez
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood
Suzanne B. Rudy















1412
Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Overview
Our Company believesWe believe that good corporate governance practices not only reflect our values andas a Company but also support our strong strategic growth and financial performance. Each committee of theour Board has a charter, which can be found on the "Corporate Governance" page of our website located at www.deltaapparelinc.com, that spells out the committee's assigned roles and responsibilities assigned to it by the Board.responsibilities. In addition, theour Board has established policies and procedures that address matters such as chief executive officer and key management succession planning, transactions with related persons, risk oversight, communications with the Board by shareholders and other interested parties, as well as the independence and qualifications of our directors. The following pages provide insightsinsight into how theour Board has implemented these policies and procedures to benefit our Company and our shareholders.
Director Independence
Our Board evaluates the independence of each director in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the listing standards of the NYSE Amex Stock Exchange.MKT. Generally, an “independent director” is a director who is not also an officer or employee of the Company or any parent or subsidiary of the Company. In addition, no director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director does not have a material relationship with the Company that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment. Our Board has reviewed the relationships between each member of the Board and the Company and determined that with the exception of Robert W. Humphreys, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, each of our current directors and each individual standing for election is “independent” as required by applicable laws and meets the applicable NYSE MKT independence requirements of the NYSE Amex Company Guide.requirements. Each director is required to keep the Board fully and promptly informed as toof any developments that might affect his or her independence.independence and the Board will regularly review the continuing independence of the directors.
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
We maintain a code of ethics and business conduct known as our Ethics Policy Statement that applies to all employees, officers and directors, including, but not limited to, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (who is also our principal accounting officer). Our Ethics Policy Statement covers topics such as conflicts of interest, insider trading, competition and fair dealing, discrimination and harassment, confidentiality, anti-corruption, compliance procedures and employee complaint and reporting procedures. Our Ethics Policy Statement is available without charge on the "Corporate Governance" page of our website located at www.deltaapparelinc.com. Any amendments or waivers to provisions of our Ethics Policy Statement that are applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller or persons performing similar functions will be posted on our website. There were no waivers of the provisions of our Ethics Policy Statement for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or any director, senior financial officer or other executive officer during fiscal year 2013.
Board Leadership Structure
The Company’sOur governance documents provide the Board with flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure offor the Company. TheOur Board of Directors does not have a policy on whether or not the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be separate and, if they are to be separate, whether the Chairman of the Board should be selected from the non-employee directors or be an employee. Theemployee of the Company. Our Board of Directors believes that it should be free to make a choice from time to time based on circumstances existing at that time to determine the leadership structure that is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. shareholders based on the particular circumstances in effect from time to time.
During fiscal year 20112013, Robert W. Humphreys served as the Chairman of theour Board and as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Humphreys is the director most familiar with our business and industry, and possesses detailedintimate knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing us and our business. TheOur Board of Directors believes thethis combined position is in the current best interest of our Company, as it makes the best use of Mr. Humphreys’ skillsextensive experience and experience withqualifications within the Companyapparel industry and in-depth knowledge of our markets, helps provide strong, unified leadership and direction on important strategic initiatives to both management and the Board, and leverages the insight gained from the combined role to ensuremost effectively lead our Company. We believe that they act with a common purpose. The Company believes that itsour overall corporate governance policies and practices, combined with the presence of a Lead Independent Director, adequately addresses any governance concerns raised by the dual Chairman and Chief Executive Officer role.
Lead Independent Director
During fiscal year 20112013, Mr. MaddreyRobert E. Staton, Sr. served as the Lead Independent Director. Theour Lead Independent Director, hasand Mr. Staton is expected to serve as our Lead Independent Director throughout fiscal year 2014. Our Lead Independent Director is appointed by the independent members of our Board, generally serves for a term of at least one year, and is empowered to carry out a number of responsibilities, including presidingcritical responsibilities. In addition to serving as a liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors, our Lead Independent Director presides at executive sessions of the Board acting as liaison betweenand at meetings at which our Chairman is not present, including any executive sessions of the Chairmanindependent directors, approves meeting schedules to ensure there is sufficient time for discussion of agenda items, advises on and the other Directors, and advising with respect to the schedule, agendaapproves meeting agendas and information provided for Board meetings.meetings and meetings of independent directors, calls meetings of the independent directors as appropriate, and is available for direct communication with shareholders. The Lead Independent Director, along with theour other non-employee directors, also provides independent oversight of management and the Company’s strategy.
Board of Directors
During the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011, the Board was composed of nine independent directors and Robert W. Humphreys, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Two of the directors, Mr. William F. Garrett and Dr. A. Max Lennon are retiring from the Board and will not be standing for re-election. The following table, listed in alphabetical order, sets forth the names of the nominees for director and their respective ages, years as director and positions with the Company.
Directors' Name Age Director Since Position
James A. Cochran 64 2008 Director
Sam P. Cortez 48 2010 Director
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood 66 2007 Director
Dr. G. Jay Gogue 64 2010 Director
Robert W. Humphreys 54 1999 Chairman and CEO
E. Erwin Maddrey, II 70 1999 Director
David T. Peterson 60 2003 Director
Robert E. Staton 65 2009 Director

1513
Table of Contents

Each of the Company's directors brings extensive management and leadership experience gained through his or her service to diverse businesses. Below is a description of the backgrounds of our directors, along with some of the attributes that led to their selection as nominee for the Board for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012.
James A. Cochran. James A. Cochran is Chief Financial Officer of Greenway Medical Technologies, Inc., a business providing software solutions for healthcare providers, a position he has held since 2009. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President responsible for Investor Relations and Corporate Strategies of TurboChef Technologies, Inc., a provider of equipment, technology and services for high-speed food preparation, and served in that capacity from 2007 until January 2009. From 2003 until 2007, Mr. Cochran also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TurboChef Technologies, Inc. Mr. Cochran’s professional experience includes public accounting, mergers and acquisitions, investor relations, corporate strategy and financial management in public and private enterprises. This broad and diverse knowledge base provides the Board with valuable insight in a number of disciplines.
Sam P. Cortez. Sam P. Cortez has been the principal of KCL Development LLC, a provider of corporate finance and advisory services, since 2003. Prior to 2003, he was employed in the investment banking industry, including Lehman Brothers, Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette, Alex Brown & Sons, and Morgan Stanley International. Mr. Cortez serves as a director of Hancock Fabrics, Inc. and as chairperson of its Management Review and Compensation Committee and on its Audit Committee. He was formerly a director of World Waste Technologies, Inc., a development stage technology company, from 2005 to 2009. Mr. Cortez’s experience includes mergers and acquisitions, strategy development, financing transactions and spin-offs. In addition to investment banking activities, he has served on boards and committees of private, public and not-for-profit organizations. His intimate knowledge of financial markets and strategic transactions brings a depth of knowledge in these areas as we continue to grow the Company.
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood. Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood is the Director of the Wake Forest University National Science Foundation Partners for Innovation Program, a position she began in July 2010. From 2004 until July 2010, she served as Director of the University Office of Entrepreneurship & Liberal Arts at Wake Forest University. Previously, she served as the Jack M. Gill Chair of Entrepreneurship and Director of The Johnson Center for Entrepreneurship & Innovation at Indiana University from 1998 to 2004. Prior to her appointment at Indiana University, Dr. Gatewood was the Executive Director of the Gulf Coast Small Business Development Center Network at the University of Houston. Dr. Gatewood’s academic background includes advanced business degrees in finance and business strategy. Her career has focused on entrepreneurship, growth strategies and small business education and development. She has extensive exposure to business development and models in international developing economies. Her perspectives on strategy, development and entrepreneurship bring unique insight to board discussions.
Dr. G. Jay Gogue. Dr. G. Jay Gogue is President of Auburn University, a position he has held since 2007. From 2003 to 2007, he served as President of the University of Houston and Chancellor of the University of Houston System. Prior to serving at the University of Houston, he was President of New Mexico State University from 2000 to 2003 and Provost of Utah State University from 1995 to 2000. Dr. Gogue began his career in higher education administration in 1986 as Associate Director of the Office of University Research at Clemson University, where he also served as Vice President for research and Vice President/Vice Provost for agriculture and natural resources. Dr. Gogue has served as an accreditation reviewer for the Pacific Northwest Association of Schools and Colleges, Commission on Colleges. Dr. Gogue has experience leading large educational institutions. This leadership has involved development of strategic plans, operating under difficult budgetary constraints and balancing the needs of diverse stakeholders including students, faculty, alumni and state government. We believe his leadership experience serves the Board well.
Robert W. Humphreys.Robert W. Humphreys currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Delta Apparel, Inc. and has served in this capacity since December 1999. Mr. Humphreys has also been serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company since June 2009. Mr. Humphreys served as President of the Delta Apparel division of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. from April 1999 until December 1999. Previously, he served as Vice President-Finance and Assistant Secretary of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. from May 1998 to November 1999. From January 1987 to May 1998, Mr. Humphreys was President of Stevcoknit Fabrics Company, the former knit fabrics division of a subsidiary of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. Mr. Humphreys has over 25 years of experience in the textile and apparel industry, including senior leadership roles in operations and finance, as well as serving as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer for over 10 years. He has provided strong leadership as the Company has grown from a catalog tee shirt company to a diverse active apparel company. His deep knowledge of Delta Apparel and of the industry provides the Board a resource of great value.
E. Erwin Maddrey, II. E. Erwin Maddrey, II is currently the President of Maddrey & Associates, which engages in the business of investing and providing consulting services, and has held this position since 2000. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc., a textile manufacturing company, from its founding in 1984 until June 2000. Mr. Maddrey currently serves as a director of KEMET Corporation and served as a director of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. until 2007. Mr. Maddrey has been a director since 1999 and is a member of the Audit Committee and Corporate Governance Committee in 2011. Mr. Maddrey has experience as a President and CEO of a public textile and apparel company, as well as

16
Table of Contents

service on boards and committees of a variety of public and not for profit organizations. The deep and broad knowledge provided by this experience, coupled with his extensive financial knowledge, provide significant value to the Board.
Robert E. Staton, Sr. Robert E. Staton, Sr. is currently the Chief of Staff at Presbyterian College in Clinton, South Carolina, a position he has held since July 2011.  From 2006 until July 2011, he served as Executive Vice President of External Relations at Presbyterian College.  From 2002 until 2008, Mr. Staton served as Chairman of the Board of Carolina National Bank in Columbia, South Carolina until its acquisition by First National Bank of the South. From 1986 until 2002, Mr. Staton served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Life, a publicly traded company primarily in the business of selling and servicing voluntary benefits programs. Mr. Staton serves as a director of First National Bankshares and was a director of First National Bank of the South from 2008 until July 2010. Mr. Staton has extensive professional experience in legal matters and senior executive positions with financial companies, as well as service as the Chairman of a public company. Additionally, he has served on numerous boards and committees of public, private and civic, educational and other organizations. The knowledge and insight gained from this diverse experience contribute greatly to the Board.
Meetings and Attendance
The Board and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Directors are expected to make every effort to attend meetings of the Board, assigned committees and annual meetings of shareholders. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the board meetings and assigned committee meetings held during the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011. During fiscal year 2011, the Board held five in-person meetings and one telephonic meeting. In addition, the Audit Committee held five meetings, the Compensation Committee held six meetings, and the Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings. All of the incumbent directors attended the 2010 Annual Meeting of shareholders and all directors are expected to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting. Independent directors meet regularly in executive session at all regularly scheduled meetings of the Board with no members of management present. The Company's lead independent director presides at each executive session. During fiscal year 2011, Mr. Maddrey, II was the lead independent director, and Mr. Staton is expected to be the lead independent director during fiscal year 2012. Throughout the year, our directors communicate informally with management on a variety of topics, including suggestions for Board or committee meeting agenda topics, recent developments, and other matters of interest to the directors.
Board Committees
TheOur Board delegates variouscertain responsibilities and authority to different board committees. Committeesits various committees and these committees regularly report on their activities and actions to the full board.Board. The Board currently has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Corporate Governance Committee (which isserves as our nominating committee), and may also appoint other committees from time to time. Each of the members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Corporate Governance Committee has been determined by the Board to be independent as required by applicable lawslegal requirements and meets the applicable NYSE MKT independence requirements of the NYSE Amex Company Guidestandards and, in addition, in the case of the Audit Committee, under the independence requirements established by the SEC. Each committee’s activities are governed by a written committee charter. Copies of the committee charters arecharter, which is available throughwithout charge via our internet website at www.deltaapparelinc.com, or by sending a request in writing to MarthaJustin M. Watson, CorporateGrow, Secretary, at 322 S. Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601.
The following table details the membership of each of our Board committees during the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011June 29, 2013, and the expected committee membership in theour 2014 fiscal year ending June 30, 2012.year.
 20112013 Fiscal Year 20122014 Fiscal Year
Directors'Director NameAuditCompensationGovernance AuditCompensationGovernance
James A. CochranXXXX
Sam P. CortezXXXX
Dr. Elizabeth J. GatewoodXXXX
Dr. G. Jay GogueCC
E. Erwin Maddrey, II (1)X X   X
David T. Peterson X
Sam P. CortezXX
William F. GarrettCX  CX
Dr. Elizabeth J. GatewoodSuzanne B. RudyX   X X
Robert E. Staton, Sr. X
Dr. G. Jay GogueC  
Dr. A. Max LennonC
E. Erwin Maddrey, IIXCXX
David T. PetersonXCCX
Robert E. StatonXXXC
Robert W. Humphreys       
C - Committee Chairperson       
X - Committee Member       

17
Table(1) Mr. Maddrey did not stand for re-election as a director at our November 8, 2012, annual meeting of Contents

shareholders.

Audit Committee
Our. The Audit Committee serves as an independent and objective party to oversee and monitor the financial and reporting processes of the Company, including the general quality of the Company's financial statements and reporting, the audits of the financial statements of the Company and the Company’s accounting and internal control system. Ourcontrols and policies. The Audit Committee appoints, (subject to shareholder ratification), evaluates, and, when appropriate, replaces the independent registered public accounting firm engaged to audit our financial statements. The outsideindependent auditors report directly to ourthe Audit Committee and the Audit Committee determines the compensation and other terms of the engagement and oversees their work. The Audit Committee also monitors and reviews our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as well as our procedures with respect to maintaining books and records, the adequacy and implementation of internal auditing, accounting, disclosure, and financial controls, and our policies concerning financial reporting and business practices. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for establishing procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by Company employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
After considering relationships between each member of the Audit Committee and the Company and its subsidiaries, and reviewing the qualifications of the members of the Audit Committee, theour Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets all applicable independence and financial literacy requirements as defined in NYSE MKT governance standards and applicable SEC regulations. Further, due to Dr. G. Jay Gogue's years of extensive experience overseeing the NYSE Amex Company Guide. Furthermore, thefinancial, operational and strategic functions of complex organizations with budgets of up to approximately one billion dollars, our Board of Directors has determined that Dr. G. Jay Gogue qualifies as an audit"audit committee financial expertexpert" as defined in regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC regulations.
Compensation Committee
The. Our Compensation Committee oversees the performance evaluationdevelops our overall compensation philosophy and recommends compensation for the Chief Executive Officer to the independent members of the Board of Directors. In addition, the Compensation Committeeprograms, reviews and determines compensation, including salaries, bonuses and equity compensation, for the otherour named executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer, and reviews and determines director compensation. TheOur Compensation Committee also oversees, reviews and administers all of the Company’s present and future compensation and executive benefit plans and programs, including equity compensation plans and plans pursuant to which performance-based compensation may be granted. TheOur Compensation Committee is authorized to delegate its responsibilities as it deems necessary or appropriate.
Corporate Governance Committee
The. Our Corporate Governance Committee identifies, interviews and recommends director nominees for election to the Board pursuant to written guidelines approved by the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee also develops and recommends to the Board corporate governance guidelines and standards for business conduct and ethics, and oversees the annual self-evaluation of the Board and its committees, and makes recommendations concerning the structure and membership of the other Board committees. Our Corporate Governance Committee

14
Table of Contents

also oversees the performance evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer and succession planning with respect to the Chief Executive Officer as well as the other executive officers of the Company. Our Corporate Governance Committee also serves as the Board's nominating committee and identifies, interviews and recommends director nominees for election to the Board pursuant to written guidelines approved by the Board.
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Our Board oversees and regularly assesses our enterprise and strategic risk management processes. This risk oversight responsibility is enabled by management reporting processes designed to provide visibility to the Board regarding the identification, assessment and management of critical risks and associated risk mitigation strategies. These areas of focus include competitive, economic, operational, financial, legal, regulatory, compliance, safety, environmental and political risks. Our Board recognizes that it is neither possible nor prudent to eliminate all risk and that properly measured risk-taking is essential for the Company to be competitive and to achieve its strategic objectives.
Our Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through committees. Oversight responsibility for particular areas of risk is allocated among the Board committees according to the committee’s area of responsibility as reflected in its charter. In particular:
a)The full Board oversees strategic, financial and operational risks and exposures associated with our annual business plans and other current matters that may present material risk to the Company’s operations, strategies, prospects, and reputation.
b)The Audit Committee regularly reviews and oversees the risks associated with financial matters, particularly financial reporting, tax, accounting, disclosure, internal control over financial reporting, financial policies, credit and liquidity matters, compliance with legal and regulatory matters, including environmental matters, and the Company's related risk management policies.
c)The Compensation Committee oversees risks associated with attraction and retention of executive talent, management development, executive management succession planning, and compensation philosophy and programs, including a periodic review of compensation programs to ensure that they do not encourage excessive risk-taking.
d)The Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks associated with governance matters, including our Ethics Policy Statement, succession planning for our directors, Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers, and the structure and performance of the Board and its committees.
Our Board believes that its leadership structure properly supports its risk oversight functions and responsibilities. The appropriate directors chair the various committees involved in risk oversight, there is open communication between management and directors, and all directors are involved in the risk oversight function.
Board Self-EvaluationMeetings, Attendance & Executive Sessions
Our Board and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. Directors are expected to make every effort to attend meetings of the Board, assigned committees and annual meetings of shareholders. Attendance by directors at Board and committee meetings during fiscal year 2013 averaged 94%, and each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served during fiscal year 2013. During fiscal year 2013, the Board held seven in-person meetings and three telephonic meetings. The Audit Committee held fourteen meetings, the Compensation Committee held five meetings, and the Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting. All of the incumbent directors attended the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders and all directors are expected to attend the 2013 Annual Meeting. Independent directors meet regularly in executive session at all regularly scheduled meetings of the Board with no members of management present. Our Company's Lead Independent Director presides at each executive session. Throughout the year, our directors communicate informally with management on a variety of topics, including suggestions for Board or committee meeting agenda topics, recent developments, and other matters of interest to the directors.
Retention of Independent Advisors
Our Board is authorized and empowered to retain independent advisors and consultants when it deems appropriate and the charter for each of its committees empowers each committee to retain independent advisors and consultants when appropriate.
Succession Planning
In light of the critical importance of executive leadership to our success, our Board has a chief executive officer and key management succession planning process that is led by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee is charged with the responsibility of identifying and evaluating candidates to succeed our Chief Executive Officer and to report, at least annually, to the Board on the status of the succession plan. The Corporate Governance Committee also reviews the potential internal candidates for each of our critical senior management positions and identifies areas of growth for those candidates that will best enable them to

15
Table of Contents

fill any anticipated or emergency leadership needs. Where there is not a satisfactory internal candidate for a position, our Board considers whether outside candidates are likely to be available in a timely manner and whether other alternatives need to be considered.
Declassified Board
Our Board of Directors conducts a self-evaluation of its performance on an annual basis, which includes a review of the Board's composition, responsibilities, leadershipis not classified and committee structure, processes, and effectiveness.is elected annually.
Director Nominations
The Corporate Governance Committee identifies potential director candidates through a variety of means, including recommendations from members of the Board, suggestions from Company management, and shareholder recommendations. The Committee may also, in its discretion, engage director search firms to identify candidates. During fiscal year 20112013, the Corporate Governance Committee did not retain the services of any director search firm and accordingly, no fees were paid to a director search firm or other third party to assist in identifying and evaluating director candidates.
Shareholders may recommend director candidates for consideration by the Corporate Governance Committee by submitting a written recommendation to the Committee, c/o MarthaJustin M. Watson, CorporateGrow, Secretary, Delta Apparel, Inc., 322 S. Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601, or by email to martha.watson@deltaapparel.com,justin.grow@deltaapparel.com, or by fax to (864) 232-5199. The recommendation should include (i) the name, address and telephone number of the nominating shareholder, and(ii) the nominee’s name, address, telephone number, qualifications (including principal occupation and employment history), and written consent to be named as a nominee in the Company’s proxy statement and to serve as a director, if elected. Pursuant toelected, and (iii) the Company’s bylaws,additional information regarding the nominating shareholder and nominee required by our Bylaws. Our Secretary typically must receive the recommendation not less than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the prior year annual meeting. However, because we anticipate that the date of the fiscal year 2014 annual meeting of shareholders will be more than 30 days after the date of the 2013 Annual Meeting, recommendations for the election of directors for the fiscal year 2014 annual meeting of shareholders must be received by the Company not later than 10 days after notice or public disclosure of the date of the fiscal year 2014 annual meeting of shareholders for the recommendation to be considered by the Corporate Governance Committee.  This notice will be included in our Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement for the fiscal year 2014 annual meeting of shareholders.  A copy of our bylawsBylaws may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Secretary of the Company.
TheOur Board of Directors has adopted qualification standards for the selection of independent nominees for director which can be

18
Table found on the "Corporate Governance" page of Contents

foundour website at our internet website: www.deltaapparelinc.com. As provided in these standards, at a minimum, a nominee for our Board must (i) be over 21 years of age at the time of election; (ii) have experience in a position with a high degree of responsibility in a business or other organization; (iii) be able to read and understand basic financial statements; (iv) possess integrity and have high moral character; (v) be willing to apply sound, independent business judgment; and (vi) have sufficient time to devote to theour Company.
The Company has noWe do not have a formal policy regarding Board member diversity; however, theour Corporate Governance Committee considers and discusses diversity in selecting nominees for director and in the re-nomination of an incumbent director. The Committee views diversity broadly, including gender, ethnicity, differences of viewpoint, geographic location, skills, education, and professional and industry knowledge and experience, among other factors, and its goal is to nominate candidates from a broad range of experiences and backgrounds. The Company believesWe believe that a variety and balance of perspectives on theour Board can result in more thoughtful discussions and deliberations.
In considering the re-nomination of an incumbent director, the Corporate Governance Committee reviews the director’s overall service to the Company during his or her term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation and quality of performance, as well as any special skills or diversity that such director brings to the board.our Board. In evaluating incumbent directors and all potential new directors, the Committee considers, among other things, the candidate’s leadership, strategic, or policy setting experience; experience and expertise that is relevant to the Company’sour business; experience that provides theour Board with a diversity of background;backgrounds; technical or other specialized expertise; and whether the candidate has high ethical character and a reputation for honesty, integrity and sound business judgment. All director candidates, whether recommended by shareholders or identified by other means, are initially screened by the Corporate Governance Committee, who may seek additional background information and qualifications of the candidate. With respect to new director candidates who pass the initial screening, the Corporate Governance Committee conducts interviews with the candidates and then meets to discuss and consider each candidate’s qualifications and potential contributions to theour Board, and determines by majority vote whether to recommend such candidates to the Board of Directors.our Board. The final decision to either appoint a candidate to fill a vacancy between Annual Meetingsannual meetings of shareholders or include a candidate on the slate of nominees proposed at an Annual Meetingannual meeting of shareholders is made by theour Board.

16
Table of Contents

Board Self-Evaluation
Our Board of Directors.Directors annually evaluates and assesses its performance and effectiveness as well as that of its committees. This assessment includes a comprehensive review of our Board's composition, responsibilities, leadership and committee structure, processes, and effectiveness.
Shareholder Communication with Directors
Shareholders desiring to communicate directly with theour Board of Directors or any individual members of the Boarddirector may do so in writing addressed to the intended recipient or recipients, c/o MarthaJustin M. Watson, CorporateGrow, Secretary, Delta Apparel, Inc., 322 S. Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601, or by email to martha.watson@deltaapparel.com,justin.grow@deltaapparel.com, or by fax to (864) 232-5199. All such communication will be reviewed by our Secretary, who will removeredirect communications relatingdetermined to be solicitations, junk mail, communication primarily commercial or other correspondence relating to customer service concerns.operational in nature, or that request general information regarding the Company. All other shareholder communications will be promptly forwarded to the applicable member(s) of our Board of Directors or to the entirecollective Board of Directors, as requested in the shareholder communication.
The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
We have a comprehensive enterprise risk management process in which management is responsible for managingIssues or concerns regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or audit matters or possible violations of the Company's risks. The Board and its committees provide review and oversight in connection with these efforts. The Board recognizes that it is neither possible nor prudent to eliminate all risk. Purposeful and appropriate risk taking is essential for the Company toEthics Policy Statement should be competitive and to achieve its strategic objectives.
The Board implements its risk oversight function both as a whole and through committees, which play a significant role in carrying out risk oversight. The risk oversight responsibility is enabled by management reporting processes that are designed to provide visibilitycommunicated pursuant to the Board about the identification, assessment and management of critical risks and management’s risk mitigation strategies. These areas of focus include competitive, economic, operational, financial, legal, regulatory, compliance, safety, environmental and political risks. While the Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of management’s risk management policies, oversight responsibility for particular areas of risk is allocated among the Board committees according to the committee’s area of responsibility as reflected in the committee charters.
In particular:
a)The full Board oversees strategic, financial and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual plan and other current matters that may present material risk to the Company’s operations, plans, prospects or reputation; acquisitions; and executive management succession planning.
b)The Audit Committee oversees risks associated with financial matters, particularly financial reporting, tax, accounting, disclosure, internal control over financial reporting, financial policies, credit and liquidity matters and compliance with legal and regulatory matters including environmental matters.
c)The Compensation Committee oversees risks and rewards associated with the Company’s attraction and retention of

19
Table of Contents

talent, management development, executive management succession plans, and compensation philosophy and programs, including a periodic review of such compensation programs to ensure that they do not encourage excessive risk-taking.
d)The Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks associated with company governance, including Delta Apparel’s code of ethics, director succession planning, and the structure and performance of the Board and its committees.
The Company believes that its leadership structure, discussed in detail above, supports the risk oversight functionterms of the Board. Strong directors chairEthics Policy Statement, which is available without charge on the various committees involved in risk oversight, there is open communication between management and directors, and all directors are involved in the risk oversight function."Corporate Governance" page of our website located at www.deltaapparelinc.com.
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Company has assessedCompensation Committee regularly assesses the potential riskrisks associated with the Company’sour compensation programs and practices, including any risk that would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. This includedassessment includes an assessmentanalysis of the risks associated with each element of employee compensation. The assessment consideredcompensation and considers certain design features of the compensation programs that reduce the likelihood of excessive risk taking such asby employees. Among these design features are reasonable performance targets tied to compensation, capped payouts of incentive compensation, a balance of short and long-term incentives, a balance of cash and equity incentives, and the vesting of awards over time. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") section of this Proxy Statement more fully describes the Company'sour compensation philosophy and programs. The Company doesWe do not believe our compensation program encourages excessive or inappropriate risk taking.
Succession Planning
In light of the critical importance of executive leadership to the Company's success, the Board has a chief executive officer and key management succession planning process that is led by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee is charged with the responsibility of identifying and evaluating candidates to succeed the Chief Executive Officer and to report, at least annually, to the Board on the status of the succession plan. As a part of the succession planning process, the Corporate Governance Committee also reviews and assesses any concerns regarding the long-term growth and development of the executive officers and the preparedness of the Company for the possibility of an emergency situation involving the chief executive officer or other executive officers and key managers.
Code of Ethics
The Company maintains a code of business conduct and ethics known as the Ethics Policy Statement that applies to all salaried employees, officers and directors, including, but not limited to, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer (who is also our principal accounting officer). The Ethics Policy Statement covers topics including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, insider trading, competition and fair dealing, discrimination and harassment, confidentiality, payments to government personnel, compliance procedures and employee complaint procedures. The Ethics Policy Statement is available on our internet website at www.deltaapparelinc.com. Any amendments or waivers to provisions of our Ethics Policy Statement that are applicable to our Chief Executive Officer or our Chief Financial Officer will be posted on our internet website.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
All of the members of the Compensation Committee are non-employee directors of the Company and are not former officers of the Company or its subsidiaries. During fiscal year 20112013, no executive officer of the Company served as a member of the board or compensation committee of a corporationan entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Board or Compensation Committee of Delta Apparel, Inc.our Company.
Related Party Transactions
The CompanyOur Board of Directors has adopted written policies and procedures with respect to related party transactions that can be accessed on the "Corporate Governance" page of our website located at www.deltaapparelinc.com. Pursuant to these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee reviews all relationships and transactions in which theour Company and its directors, executive officers or their immediate family members are participants to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. On an annual basis, each director and named executive officer is obligated to complete a Director and Officer Questionnaire which requires disclosure of any transactions with the Company in which the director or executive officer, or any member of his or her immediate family, has a direct or indirect material interest. In addition, the Audit Committee charter requires that members of the Audit Committee review and approve all related party transactions for which such approval is required under applicable law, including the Securitiesapplicable SEC regulations and Exchange Commission and the NYSE Amex rules.MKT standards. Our Board of Directors is committed to upholding the highest legal and ethical conduct in fulfilling its responsibilities and recognizes that related party transactions can present a heightened risk of potential or actual conflicts of interest. Accordingly,
Insider Trading and Hedging Policy
We maintain an insider trading policy that prohibits the purchase or sale of Company securities while being aware of material, non-public information about the Company as well as the disclosure of such information to others who may trade in securities of the Company. Our insider trading policy also prohibits our directors, executive officers and employees from engaging in hedging activities or other short-term or speculative transactions in the Company's securities such as short sales, puts, calls or any similar transaction involving the Company's securities.
Director and Executive Officer Stock Ownership Guidelines
To better align the interests of our directors and senior management team with our shareholders and to further demonstrate a general matter, itcommitment to the Company and its future well-being, our Board of Directors has adopted minimum stock ownership requirements and guidelines with respect to our non-employee directors and certain of our executive officers. These guidelines require our non-employee directors to retain throughout their entire tenure with our Board at least 50% of all shares received as compensation for their Board service. In

17
Table of Contents

addition, these guidelines require the following executive officers to maintain ownership of a minimum amount of Company stock equal to that indicated below.
Chief Executive Officer: 4 times annual base salary.
Chief Financial Officer: 2 times annual base salary.
Chief Operating Officer: 2 times annual base salary.
The covered executives are granted certain time periods in which to gain compliance with the ownership requirements and are subject to mandatory share retention provisions until compliance is our preference to avoid related party transactions.achieved. The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for monitoring compliance with these guidelines.





2018
Table of Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP
OF MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
Management
The following table showssets forth the number of shares of Common Stockour common stock and Common Stockcommon stock equivalents beneficially owned as of September 16, 201113, 2013, by (i) our directors, (ii) the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table and (iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. We believe that all of the individuals listed below have sole voting and investment power over the shares of our common stock identified as beneficially owned.
Directors and
Executive Officers
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Excluding Options
Option Shares
Currently
Exercisable or
Exercisable
within 60 Days
Percentage
Including Options
       
James A. Cochran5,000
 (1)—
 *
 
Steven E. Cochran16,111
 25,000
 *
 
Sam P. Cortez4,400
 —
 *
 
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood9,038
 —
 *
 
Dr. G. Jay Gogue4,000
 —
 *
 
Robert W. Humphreys441,045
 312,500
 9.5% 
Deborah H. Merrill44,646
 84,000
 1.6% 
David T. Peterson25,603
 —
 *
 
Suzanne B. Rudy2,250
 —
 *
 
Kenneth D. Spires56,636
(2)—
 *
 
Robert E. Staton, Sr.5,250
 —
 *
 
Martha M. "Sam" Watson89,054
 104,000
 2.5% 
All current directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)646,397
(3)525,500
 14.8% 
       
* Less than 1% of the shares deemed outstanding.      

(1)These shares are pledged as security.

(2)On November 26, 2012, Kenneth D. Spires, formerly a named executive officer of the Company, resigned from his position as President of our M.J. Soffe, LLC business unit.

(3)Includes all shares deemed to be beneficially owned by any current director or executive officer.



19
Table of Contents

Principal Shareholders
The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of September 13, 2013, by each personindividual or entity, excluding our current officers and directors, known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Common Stock, (ii) the directors, (iii) the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table and (iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group.our common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that the personsindividuals or entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown.
5% Shareholders, Directors and
Executive Officers
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Excluding Options
Option Shares
Currently
Exercisable or
Exercisable
within 60 Days
Percentage
Including Options
FMR LLC
Edward C. Johnson
Abigail P. Johnson
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
852,200
(1)—
10.0%
Franklin Resources, Inc.
Franklin Advisory Services, LLC
Charles B. Johnson
Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.
One Franklin Parkway
San Mateo, CA 94403
775,000
(2)—
9.1%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
Palisades West, Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746
709,324
(3)—
8.3%
Aegis Financial Corporation
Scott L. Barbee
1100 N. Glebe Rd., Suite 1040
Arlington, VA 22201
576,842
(4)—
6.8%
Wilen Management Company, Inc.
2360 West Joppa Road, Suite 226
Lutherville, MD 21093
674,001
(5)—
7.9%
E. Erwin Maddrey, II
233 North Main Street, Suite 200
Greenville, SC 29601
700,071
(6)—
8.2%
James A. Cochran2,000
 —
*
Steven E. Cochran7,280
 12,500
*
Sam P. Cortez1,400
 —
*
William F. Garrett8,896
 —
*
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood4,538
 —
*
Dr. G. Jay Gouge1,000
 —
*
Robert W. Humphreys428,073
 312,500
8.7%
Dr. A. Max Lennon19,754
 —
*
Deborah H. Merrill35,948
 70,666
1.2%
David T. Peterson22,603
 —
*
Kenneth D. Spires94,528
 110,666
2.4%
Robert E. Staton, Sr.2,250
 —
*
Martha M. "Sam" Watson80,356
 90,666
2.0%
All current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)1,408,697
(7)596,998
23.5%
     
* Less than 1% of the shares deemed outstanding.    

5% Shareholders
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Excluding Options
Option Shares
Currently
Exercisable or
Exercisable
within 60 Days
Percentage
Including Options
       
Franklin Resources, Inc.
Franklin Advisory Services, LLC
Charles B. Johnson
Rupert H. Johnson, Jr.
One Franklin Parkway
San Mateo, CA 94403
743,700
(1)—
 9.44% 
Wilen Management Company, Inc.
2360 West Joppa Road, Suite 226
Lutherville, MD 21093
730,943
(2)—
 9.28% 
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
Palisades West, Building One
6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, TX 78746
706,525
(3)—
 8.97% 
Greenwood Investments, Inc.
200 Claredon Street - 25th Floor
Boston, MA 02116
578,434
(4)—
 7.34% 
Aegis Financial Corporation
Scott L. Barbee
1100 N. Glebe Rd., Suite 1040
Arlington, VA 22201
560,469
(5)—
 7.11% 
E. Erwin Maddrey, II
233 North Main Street, Suite 200
Greenville, SC 29601
528,983

—
 6.71% 
Wells Fargo & Company/MN
420 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94163		482,888
(6)—
 6.13% 
(1)The information set forth above is based on a Schedule 13F-HR that was filed by FMR LLC (“FMR”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2011 with respect to our common stock. In Amendment No. 7 to Schedule 13G that was filed by FMR with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2011 with respect to the Company's common stock, FMR reported that Fidelity Management & Research Company (“Fidelity”), which has the same business address as FMR, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR and is an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. As a result of acting as investment adviser to various investment companies registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, Fidelity is the beneficial owner of all of the shares reported above. The Schedule 13G/A reported that one investment company, Fidelity Low Priced Stock Fund, owns all shares set forth above. The Schedule 13G/A reported that Edward C. Johnson III and FMR, through its control of Fidelity, and the funds each has sole power to dispose of the 852,200 shares. Members of the family of Edward C. Johnson III are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B shares of common stock of FMR. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered into a shareholders' voting agreement with the other holders of all of the other Series B shares under which all Series B shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common stock and the execution of the shareholders' voting agreement, they may be deemed to form a controlling group with respect to FMR. The Schedule 13G/A indicates

21
Table of Contents

that neither FMR nor Edward C. Johnson III has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the Fidelity Funds, which power resides with the Funds' Boards of Trustees. Fidelity carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines established by the Funds' Boards of Trustees.

(2)The information set forth above is based on a Schedule 13F-HRForm 13F that was filed by Franklin Resources, Inc. (“FRI”) with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on August 12, 20111, 2013, with respect to the Company's common stock. In Amendment No. 58 to Schedule 13G that was filed by FRI with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on February 6, 2009January 24, 2013, with respect to the Company's common stock, FRI reported that the shares are beneficially owned by one or more investment companies or other managed accounts that are advised by direct and indirect investment advisory subsidiaries of FRI. The Schedule 13G/A reported that the advisory contracts grant to the applicable investment advisory subsidiary(ies) all investment and/or voting power over the securities owned by their investment advisory clients. Accordingly, such subsidiary(ies) may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares shown in the table. The Schedule 13G/A reported that Charles B. Johnson and Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. (the “FRI Principal Shareholders”) (each of whom has the same business address as FRI) each own in excess of 10% of the outstanding common stock and are the principal shareholders of FRI and may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of securities held by persons and entities advised by FRI subsidiaries. The Schedule 13G/A reported that one of the investment advisory subsidiaries, Franklin Advisory Services, LLC (whose address is One Parker Plaza, Ninth Floor, Fort Lee, New Jersey 07024), has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares shown. FRI, the FRI Principal Shareholders and the investment advisory subsidiaries disclaim any economicpecuniary interest in or beneficial ownership inthat they beneficially own the shares and are of the view that they are not acting as a “group” for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Schedule 13G/A reported that Franklin Microcap Value Fund, a series of Franklin Value Investors Trust, a company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, has an interest in more than 5% of the class of securities reported.

(2)The information set forth above is based on a Form 13F that was filed by Wilen Management Company, Inc. (“Wilen”) with the SEC on July 22, 2013, with respect to the Company's common stock. Wilen reported that it has sole power to vote and/or dispose of the shares disclosed above.
(3)The number of shares currently held by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (formerly Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc.) (“Dimensional”) is based on a Schedule 13F-HRForm 13F that was filed by Dimensional with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on August 9, 2011.14, 2013, with respect to the Company's common stock. In the Schedule 13F-HR,Form 13F, Dimensional reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 708,256702,288 of these shares and no voting power aswith respect to 1,0684,237 of these shares. In an Amendment to Schedule 13G that was filed by Dimensional with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on February 11, 2011,8, 2013, Dimensional reported that it furnishes investment advice to four investment companies and serves as investment manager to certain other commingled group trusts and separate accounts. The Schedule 13G/A reported that all of the shares of the Company's common stock were owned by such investment companies, trusts or accounts. The Schedule 13G/A reported that Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities.

(4)The information set forth above is based on a Form 13F filed by Greenwood Investments, Inc. with the SEC on August 12, 2013, with respect to the Company's common stock. In a Schedule 13F-HR13G that was jointly filed by Greenwood Investments, Inc., Steven Tannenbaum, Greenwood Capital Limited Partnership, MGPLA, L.P., and PVF-ST, LP (each of which has the same business address as Greenwood Investments, Inc.), with the SEC on January 18, 2013, Greenwood Investments, Inc. and Steven Tannenbaum reported that each has sole power to vote and/or dispose of the shares disclosed above.

20
Table of Contents

(5)The information set forth above is based on a Form 13F that was filed by Aegis Financial Corporation (“Aegis”) with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on August 15, 20116, 2013, with respect to ourthe Company's common stock. In aan amendment to Schedule 13G that was filed by Aegis with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC on February 12, 201014, 2013, with respect to the Company's common stock, Aegis reported that it and Scott L. Barbee (who has the same business address as Aegis) have sole power to vote and/or dispose of the shares disclosed above. The Schedule 13G reported that clients of Aegis Financial Corporation, a registered investment adviser, including two investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and other managed accounts, have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends and proceeds from the sale of shares. The Schedule 13G reported that the Aegis Value Fund, a registered investment company, has an interest in more than 5% of the class of securities reported.

(5)The information set forth above is based on a Schedule 13G/A that was filed by Wilen Management Company, Inc. (“Wilen”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 28, 2011 with respect to our common stock. Wilen reported that it has soleshared power to vote and/or dispose of the shares disclosed above.

(6)Mr. MaddreyThe information set forth above is based on a DirectorForm 13F that was filed by Wells Fargo & Company/MN (“Wells”) with the SEC on July 12, 2013, with respect to the Company's common stock. Wells reported that it has sole power to vote 24,038 of Delta Apparel, Inc. The numberthe shares disclosed above and no power to vote 458,848 of the shares shown as beneficially owned by Mr. Maddrey includes 172,588 shares held by the E. Erwin and Nancy B. Maddrey, II Foundation, a charitable trust, as to which shares Mr. Maddrey holds sole voting and investment power but disclaims beneficial ownership.

(7)Includes all shares deemed to be beneficially owned by any current director or executive officer.disclosed above.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Members of theour Board of Directors, executive officers, and persons who hold more than 10% of the Company'sour common stock are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which requires them to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect toSEC regarding their beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of the Company'sour common stock. To the Company'sour knowledge, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Company's directors, executive officers, and 10% holdersshareholders were satisfied during fiscal year 20112013.



2221
Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Delta Apparel, Inc.'s currentWe refer to the following individuals as our "named executive officers are as follows:
NameAgeTitle
Robert W. Humphreys54Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Deborah H. Merrill38Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Martha M. Watson58Vice President and Secretary
Steven E. Cochran43President, Delta Activewear
Kenneth D. Spires53President, M.J. Soffe, LLC
officers" or "NEOs" in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. Certain information with respect toregarding our named executive officers is provided below. OfficersThese individuals are appointed to serve at the discretion of theour Board. The primary business address for all executive officers except Steven E. Cochran is 322 S. Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601 for all executive officers except Steven E. Cochran and Kenneth D. Spires.. Mr. Cochran's primary business address is 2750 Premiere Parkway, Suite 100, Duluth, Georgia 30097, and the primary business address for Mr. Spires is One Soffe Drive, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28312.30097.
Robert W. Humphreys.
Robert W. Humphreys currently serves

Age: 56     Title: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

With more than 25 years experience in the apparel business, Mr. Humphreys has served Delta Apparel, Inc. as President, and Chief Executive Officer of Delta Apparel, Inc. and has served in this capacity since December 1999. Mr. Humphreys has also been serving as Chairman of the Board of Directorsa director of the Company since June 2000. Mr. Humphreys was elected Chairman of the Board in June 2009. From April 1999 until December of that year, Mr. Humphreys served as President of the Delta Apparel division of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. from April 1999 until December 1999. Previously,Prior to that, he was Delta Woodside's Vice President of Finance and Assistant Secretary. From 1987 to 1998, he served as Vice President-Finance and Assistant Secretary of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. from May 1998 to November 1999. From January 1987 to May 1998, Mr. Humphreys was President of Stevcoknit Fabrics Company, the formerDelta Woodside Industries' knit fabrics division of a subsidiary of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. Mr. Humphreys has been a director since 1999.division.
Deborah H. Merrill.
Deborah H. Merrill is currently the

Age: 40     Title: Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Deborah Merrill has served Delta Apparel since 1998 and has been Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company and has served in this capacity since July 2006. From March 2006 until July 2006,Prior to that, Ms. Merrill was Assistant Secretary of the Company from 1999 to 2006. During that time she also served as Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer of the Company. From August 2004from March 2006 until February 2006, she served asJuly 2006; Director of Corporate Reporting, Planning and Administration of the Company and from July 20002004 to July 2004, Ms. Merrill served as2006; and Director of Accounting and Administration of the Company. From March 1999Company from 2000 to June 2000, Ms. Merrill served as2004. Previously, she had been Director of Accounting and Administration of the Delta Apparel division of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc., a textile manufacturing company. From August 1998 from 1999 to February 1999, Ms. Merrill served as2000 and, Accounting Manager of theits Delta Apparel division of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc. Ms. Merrill served as Assistant Secretary of the Company from December 19991998 to March 2006. Prior to1999. Before joining Delta Apparel in 1998, she served as the Logistics Controller for GNB Technologies, a battery manufacturing company, and as an Auditor for Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Martha M. “Sam” Watson.
Martha M. Watson is currently

Age: 59     Title:Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

Martha Watson has served as Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company since November 2012. From October 2000 to November 2012, Ms. Watson served as Vice President and Secretary of the Company and has served in this capacity since October 2000.Delta Apparel. From May 2009 to December 2010, Ms. Watson was also served as the President of Junkfood Clothing Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Delta Apparel, Inc. Prior to joining Delta Apparel, Inc., Ms. Watson served aswas President of Carolina Benefit Services, a payroll company, from September 1999 to Octoberthrough 2000, and Vice President of Operations for Sunland Distribution, Inc., a public warehousing company, from January 1999 to September 1999. From 1990 to 1999 andshe was Director of Human Resources for Stevcoknit Fabrics Company, and from 1987 to 1990 she held a similar position with Delta Apparel, both of which, at the followingtime, were divisions of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc., a textile manufacturing company: Stevcoknit Fabrics Company

Steven E. Cochran

Age: 45     Title:President and Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Cochran has served as President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2013. Mr. Cochran previously served as President of the Company's Activewear division from January 19902010 to January 1999 and Delta Apparel from July 1987 to January 1990.
Steven E. Cochran. Steven E. Cochran is currently the President of Delta Activewear, the Activewear division of Delta Apparel, Inc., and has served in this capacity since October 2010.2013. Prior to joining Delta Apparel, Inc., Mr. Cochran served from June 2005 to December 2009 asthe Company, he was President of the Image Apparel Division of V.F. Corporation, a branded apparel company.company, and served in that capacity from 2005 until 2009. From May 2002 to April 2005, Mr. Cochran was Senior Vice President of Field Operations at Lesco, Inc., a turf supply company.
Kenneth D. Spires. Kenneth D. Spires is currently the President Mr. Cochran began his career at Cintas Corporation, a leading provider of M.J. Soffe, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Delta Apparel, Inc., and hascareer apparel where he served in this capacity since September 2004. From July 2000various capacities from 1997 to September 2004, Mr. Spires served as2002, including Vice President, Marketing, Merchandising and Strategy, and then as Director of Technical Services of Delta Apparel, Inc., and from November 1993National Accounts for Cintas' UTY Division. Mr. Cochran is not related to June 2000, Mr. Spires served as Vice President of Technical Services of the Delta Apparel division of Delta Woodside Industries, Inc., a textile manufacturing company.Company director James A. Cochran.


2322
Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTDISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The Compensation Committee overseas the Company’s executive compensation program on behalf of the Board. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with Company management theThis Compensation Discussion and Analysis that accompanies this report. Based on such review("CD&A") discusses the material elements of compensation earned by, paid to or awarded to each of our named executive officers during our fiscal year ended June 29, 2013, and discussions,describes the Compensation Committee recommended to the Boardprinciples and philosophies underlying our executive compensation programs and policies. In addition, you will find a series of Directors, and the Board has approved, the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysistables in this Proxy Statement containing specific information regarding our named executive officers' compensation in our 2011, 2012 and incorporation by reference into the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
David T. Peterson (Chairperson)
James A. Cochran
William F. Garrett
Robert E. Staton, Sr.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS2013 fiscal years.
Executive Summary
Delta Apparel, Inc. is a performance-drivenan international apparel design, marketing, manufacturing and sourcing company that hasfeatures a track recorddiverse portfolio of consistently delivering valuelifestyle basic and branded activewear apparel and headwear. We specialize in selling casual and athletic products through a variety of distribution channels and distribution tiers, including specialty stores, boutiques, department stores, mid and mass channels, college bookstores and the U.S. military. Our products are made available direct-to-consumer on our websites at www.soffe.com, www.junkfoodclothing.com, www.saltlife.com and www.deltaapparel.com. We design and internally manufacture the majority of our products, which allows us to offer a high degree of consistency and quality control as well as leverage scale efficiencies. We have manufacturing operations located in the United States, El Salvador, Honduras and Mexico, and use domestic and foreign contractors as additional sources of production. Our distribution facilities are strategically located throughout the United States to better serve our shareholders. customers with same-day shipping on our catalog products and weekly replenishments to retailers.
The compensation programs forof our senior level managers, including the named executive officers are designed to reward strong operating performancereceived overwhelming support at our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, with approximately 98% of the voting shares casted in the near term and completionfavor of key initiatives that drive profitability and shareholder value in the longer term, while appropriately striking the balance between risk and performance. Based upon this philosophy, we designed our executive compensation programs. Our executive compensation programs and policies in fiscal year 2013 generally remained consistent with those presented at our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders. The following table sets forth some of the key features of our program:
KEY FEATURES OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
We pay for performance and place a significant portion of executive officer compensation "at risk"
We do not allow hedging, puts, calls or similar derivative transactions related to our stock
We cap the amount of cash incentive compensation and equity awards that an executive may receive in any year
We do not reprice stock options and do not exchange "underwater" options for cash
We consider relevant external market and peer company data in establishing compensation
We do not provide guaranteed bonuses
We have robust stock ownership guidelines for key executive positions and directors
We do not provide multi-year severance benefits in our employment agreements
We have double trigger change in control severance benefits in our executive employment agreements
We do not offer a defined benefit pension plan
We pay reasonable salaries and provide appropriate benefits to our executives
We do not offer a supplemental executive retirement plan
We provide a blend of short and long-term incentive opportunities as well as a blend of cash and equity incentive opportunities
We do not provide our executives with perquisites or other personal benefits beyond what we generally provide other employees
We maximize the tax deductibility of incentive compensation
Our Compensation Committee is made up entirely of independent directors and is empowered to select and engage its own independent advisors
The principal elements of our named executive officer compensation program are base salary, performance-based annual cash incentives, service-based and performance-based long-term equity incentives, and the employee benefits provided to include fixed cashour other full-time domestic employees. We utilize a mix of the foregoing elements with the ultimate goals of aligning the short-term and equity-basedlong-term interests of our executives with those of our shareholders and attracting, retaining and appropriately rewarding executive management talent. It is also extremely important to us that the compensation at competitive median ratesof our named executive officers be directly linked to attract and retain outstanding and diverse executive talent. We then reinforceCompany performance without encouraging excessive or unnecessary risk-taking by our pay-for-performance philosophy throughexecutives. To effectively link pay with performance, our Compensation Committee believes that a significant amountportion of cash and equity-basedour named executive officer compensation that is performance-based, ormust be "at risk", that would deliver totalor not guaranteed, and directly tied to the financial success of the Company.
In evaluating and monitoring Company performance relative to the compensation that motivates and rewards short and long-term financial performance to maximize shareholder value.
Duringof our executives, we place primary emphasis on the year ended July 2, 2011, Delta Apparel, Inc. achieved the following key financial and shareholder return results:
total net sales increased 12.0% over fiscal year 2010 to $475.2 million;
gross profit dollars increased 15.3% over fiscal year 2010 to $118.2 million;
operating income increased 25.5% over fiscal year 2010 to $25.3 million;
net income increased 42.2% over fiscal year 2010 to $17.3 million;
return on capital employed, (asor "ROCE", metric. ROCE is defined as our earnings before interest and taxes as a percentage of our twelve-month average capital employed. We believe that ROCE strikes an appropriate balance between generating financial returns and the efficient allocation of our capital.

23
Table of Contents

The discussion below is intended to assist you in understanding the information provided in this Executive Summary and the accompanying compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement, and to put that information into context within our overall executive compensation program. For the reasons described in this CD&A and accompanying tables, we believe our executive compensation programs are designed to support our Company goals and encourage profitable growth for our business in years to come.
Fiscal Year 2013 Performance and Pay Implications
We believe our named executive officer compensation in fiscal year 2013 aligned well with the objectives of our performance-based compensation philosophy. Our executive officers ably managed our business through a variety of challenges during our 2013 fiscal year brought on by continuing softness in retail-level consumer demand for apparel products and difficulties experienced within our Soffe business. Despite these challenges, the Company returned to profitable growth and solid financial and operating performance in fiscal year 2013. Fiscal year 2013 also marked another record year for our Company from a revenue standpoint, with our executive team guiding us to a tenth consecutive year of increased net sales. Other notable milestones include significant revenue and operating profit growth in our Activewear division and Junkfood and The Game businesses, a 94% sales increase in our Art Gun business, an approximately 31% increase in our e-commerce business, successful early steps in our planned manufacturing expansion and domestic screen print modernization efforts, and execution on a plan to grow the branded side of our business through activities such as the recent acquisition of the Salt Life® brand.
Our emphasis on ROCE and performance-based pay is reflected in the compensation paid to our named executive officers in fiscal year 2013, particularly related to payouts pursuant to our annual cash incentive program and the forfeiture of performance-based restricted stock awards by our named executive officers. Our ROCE for fiscal year 2013 was 5.8%, which is significantly higher than our ROCE in fiscal year 2012 but below the target ROCE level set for the Company by the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation. Our average ROCE for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 was also below the average target ROCE level set for the Company by the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation. Because we did not reach these ROCE objectives and other objectives tied to our three-year compounded average growth in earnings per share ("EPS"), the majority of our named executive officers were paid a lower amount, less than half, of cash incentives in fiscal year 2013 than the target cash incentives for which they were eligible. In addition, each of our named executive officers forfeited significant amounts of equity compensation due to our ROCE in fiscal year 2013 and our average ROCE in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 being below target levels.
The cash incentives earned by Mr. Humphreys, Ms. Merrill and Ms. Watson for fiscal year 2013 and the cash incentive earned by Mr. Cochran that was tied to the consolidated performance of the Company for fiscal year 2013 aggregated to $382,025, approximately 41% of the target amount for which they were eligible. The vesting of certain restricted stock unit awards previously granted to each of Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Mr. Cochran was dependent upon the achievement of certain average ROCE levels in fiscal years 2012 and 2013. Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Mr. Cochran forfeited an aggregate of 39,750 shares of common stock, which represents one half of their aggregate target equity incentive award, due to the Company's two-year average ROCE being below the target threshold of 10%. Moreover, Mr. Humphreys forfeited approximately 12,480 shares of common stock, which represents approximately one quarter of his aggregate target equity incentive award, due to the Company's ROCE in fiscal year 2013 being below the target threshold of 7%.
More detail regarding the compensation of our named executive officers can be found within the Summary Compensation Table located within this Proxy Statement.
Key Executive Compensation Developments in Fiscal Year 2013
On December 31, 2012, each of our named executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer entered into new Employment and Non-Solicitation Agreements having a term of three years ending December 31, 2015. The terms and conditions of these employment agreements are substantially similar to those contained in our prior employment agreements with these named executive officers and are described in detail below in the section entitled "Employment Agreements".
On January 23, 2013, Steven E. Cochran was promoted to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer for the Company. In connection with his promotion, Mr. Cochran entered into an Amendment to Employment and Non-Solicitation Agreement as of January 28, 2013, and received an increase in salary commensurate with the promotion. Mr. Cochran previously served as President of the Company's Activewear division.
On November 26, 2012, Kenneth D. Spires, formerly a named executive officer of the Company, resigned from his position as President of our M.J. Soffe, LLC business unit.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our approach to executive compensation continues to be defined by the Company), a key measure in our incentive plans, improved to 11.7% from 10.2% in fiscal year 2010;following primary objectives:
share price increased from $13.94 (closing price on the last trading day of fiscal year 2010) to $17.27 (closing price on the last trading day of fiscal year 2011, for a total return to shareholders of 23.9%.
In addition to the strong near term operating performance, we also completed several key initiatives that we believe will drive continued top line growth and improved performance in the longer term. These include:
Completed the acquisition of The Cotton Exchange, a $20 million branded apparel company with a strong reputation for selling USA made collegiate products to college bookstores, and began the integration of this business as the college bookstore division within M.J. Soffe.
Obtained the exclusive license for Salt Life branded apparel, headwear, decals, bags and accessories, along with the website www.saltlife.com, which should further expand the Company's branded apparel lines and distribution channels.
Increased total manufacturing capacities by approximately 15% through expansion of the Honduran textile facility, Ceiba Textiles, to support expected future growth and further leverage fixed manufacturing costs.
Secured new loan agreements in the United States and Honduras, which increases the Company's borrowing capacity to provide long-term financing in support of our future growth plans.

In fiscal year 2011, our executive team managed our Company to another successful year as demonstrated above. Further information regarding the Company's performance is available under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on form 10-K filed with the SEC on September 1, 2011. We believe
1.Aligning the interests of our shareholders and executives;
2.Establishing a strong link between executive pay and Company performance; and

24
Table of Contents

3.Attracting, retaining and appropriately rewarding executive management talent in line with market practices.
Alignment of shareholder and executive interests
Our executive compensation program elements are aligned with the interests of our shareholders in several key respects. The annual cash incentive compensation for which our executives were eligible in fiscal year 2013 was primarily contingent on the Company's achievement of aggressive yet realistic ROCE and EPS growth goals. The Company has consistently utilized ROCE as a performance metric for many years and we believe ROCE is a balanced financial performance metric that effectively calibrates the sometimes divergent goals of increasing earnings and the efficient use of capital, and also effectively aligns shareholder and executive interests.
For several years now, the long-term equity incentives awarded to our executives have consisted entirely of service-based restricted stock units and/or performance units that are naturally linked to the value of our stock. A significant portion of these long-term equity incentive awards are based entirely on the Company's performance with respect to ROCE. All of the long-term equity incentive awards for which our Chief Executive Officer is eligible are based on the Company's performance with respect to ROCE.
In addition, the stock ownership guidelines described in the "Corporate Governance" section of this Proxy Statement require certain of our executives to maintain a significant ownership stake in the Company, thus linking their long-term interests with those of our shareholders. Our executives are also subject to the prohibitions in our insider trading policy with respect to short selling and other speculative and derivative trading activities as well as hedging transactions with respect to our stock. We believe these restrictions, coupled with our stock ownership guidelines and the structure of our short-term and long-term incentive compensation programs, effectively dovetail executive and shareholder interests.
Link between executive pay and performance
To effectively link pay with the performance of the Company, our Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of our named executive officer compensation must be "at risk" based on objective and predetermined financial performance criteria. The compensation paid to our named executive officers in fiscal year 2013 reflects our strong commitment to this pay-for-performance philosophy. Approximately 46% of the aggregate target cash compensation for which our Chief Executive Officer was eligible in fiscal year 2013 was entirely at risk and contingent on the Company's financial performance. Moreover, 100% of the equity compensation for which our Chief Executive Officer was eligible in connection with fiscal year 2013 was entirely at risk and contingent on the Company's financial performance. With respect to our other NEOs, on average, 30% of their aggregate target cash compensation for fiscal year 2013 was entirely at risk and contingent on the Company's financial performance and 50% of the equity awards for which they were eligible based on average ROCE in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 was entirely at risk and contingent on the Company's financial performance.
Attracting, retaining and appropriately rewarding executives
We seek to attract, retain and reward our executive officers by establishing compensation and benefit levels that are competitive relative to those offered by other companies in our industry of similar size, scope and complexity. Each named executive officer's overall responsibility level within our organization, unique skills and capabilities, long-term leadership potential, and individual performance is also considered and balanced in establishing compensation. Historic pay levels and internal pay equity considerations also factor into our executive compensation programs, as more fully described in this CD&A and accompanying tables contained in this Proxy Statement, are structured in a manner to support our Company and grow the business profitably in years to come.decisions.
Compensation Decision Roles
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee approves all compensation for our named executive officers except our Chief Executive Officer, recommends to the Board the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, authorizes all awards under the Company'sour stock plans, and reports its decisions to our Board. The Compensation Committee recommends to the Board. Decisions regarding non-equityindependent members of our Board the compensation of other employees are made by management. Thefor our Chief Executive Officer annually reviews the performance of each named executive officer and other senior executive officers. The Vice President ofOfficer. Our Human Resources Department provides the Compensation Committee with tally sheets that showthe recommended amounts of compensation for each element of compensation, historical compensationlevels for each compensation element, forand other applicable information. While the past five years, and amounts payable to executive officers upon different termination of employment and change of control scenarios. While recommendations of management provide valuable guidance, the Compensation Committee ultimately makes all final decisions with respect to compensation levels and structure for the executive management team (except for the Chief Executive Officer, which is ultimately made by our independent directors). The Compensation Committee's charter lists the Board)specific responsibilities of the committee and can be accessed without charge on the "Corporate Governance" page of our website at www.deltaapparelinc.com.
Company Management
Company management is responsible for developing and maintaining an effective compensation program throughout the Company. The Compensation Committee's charter listsCompany and for administering the specific responsibilities ofcompensation programs decided upon by the Compensation CommitteeCommittee. Our Chief Executive Officer annually reviews the performance of each of our other named executive officers and can be found on our internet site at www.deltaapparelinc.com.
The Committee engaged Towers Watson, an independent consulting firm, to provide advicecertain other Company officers and assistancemakes recommendations to the Compensation Committee when makingCommittee. Decisions regarding the non-equity compensation decisions for the named executive officers, as well as forof other senior executives. Towers Watson reports directly to the Compensation Committee, and all services providedemployees are made by Towers Watson are provided on their behalf. Towers Watson provides information regarding market compensation levels and practices, assists the Compensation Committee in the review and evaluation of such compensation levels and practices, and advises the Compensation Committee regarding compensation decisions. Towers Watson also provides information and advice on non-employee director compensation. Towers Watson does not provide any non-executive compensation services to us directly or indirectly through affiliates. During fiscal year 2011, Towers Watson did not provide any services to the Company other than those requested by the Compensation Committee and those related to Tower Watson's engagement as independent consultant to the Compensation Committee.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The Compensation Committee believes the most effective executive compensation program rewards achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals, and aligns the interest of the executives with those of the shareholders by rewarding performance in accordance with established goals that are aggressive, but achievable without excessive risk-taking. Simply put, the Compensation Committee believes in pay-for-performance. Our executives are accountable for the performance of the business and are compensated based on that performance. Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract and retain top executive talent and motivate them to achieve strong operational and financial performance. This performance, in turn, builds value for our shareholders.
Our compensation program is designed to:
Attract and retain highly qualified executive officers and key managers;
Motivate our executive officers to make greater personal contributions to help the Company achieve its strategic, financial and operational objectives;
Align our executive officers' interests with those of our shareholders; and
Favor performance-based compensation that is aggressive, but achievable without excessive risk taking.
Setting Executive Compensation
In determining the appropriate compensation for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviews competitive market data provided by Towers Watson on compensation practices. Towers Watson compiled competitive market data from Towers Watson's General Industry Executive Survey and among a peer group of twelve companies composed from the apparel industry. On behalf of the Compensation Committee, Towers Watson conducted a review of the compensation practices, including pay levels and compensation mix. This review also included a market analysis on long-term incentive plan practices and perquisite practices from both a peer and general industry perspective.
The peer group includes companies in the apparel industry with revenues approximately ½ to 2 times our revenue size. The peer group includes:management.

25
Table of Contents

Setting Executive Compensation
Our Human Resources Department, with input from our Chief Executive Officer, prepares recommendations for compensation for our named executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer. Separate recommendations for the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, who has no input into such recommendations, are also provided. The Compensation Committee reviews these recommendations and uses them to determine base salaries and incentive compensation for our named executive officers. Our independent directors must ultimately confirm the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer.

Our Human Resources Department's compensation recommendations for fiscal year 2013 were based on a survey conducted internally utilizing relevant executive compensation information available in the proxy statement filings of peer companies within the apparel industry with annual revenues and earnings, employee headcount, operational scope and complexity, business models, and/or financial performance similar to ours. With respect to the peer companies included in the survey that are larger than our Company from a revenue or other standpoint, "right-sizing" adjustments were made to the data to achieve a more accurate comparison. For fiscal year 2013, these peer companies were as follows:
American Apparel,Under Armour, Inc.Kenneth Cole ProductionsHanesbrands, Inc.Steve Madden, Ltd.
Ennis, Inc.Maidenform Brands, Inc.True Religion Apparel, Inc.
Gildan Activewear, Inc.Oxford Industries Inc.Vera Bradley Designs,Lululemon Athletica, Inc.
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.Perry Ellis International Inc.Volcom Inc.
Towers Watson noted that although
Various published and subscription-based compensation market data was also utilized in conducting the usesurvey and in formulating the recommendations provided to the Compensation Committee. We do not directly benchmark against a specific peer company or a particular compensation or market survey, but rather utilize the data from these sources as a general guide to market compensation levels within our industry. The Compensation Committee, at times, also compares certain individual elements of ½ to 2 times revenue is a standard methodology for determining a peer group,our named executive officer compensation against other comparable publicly-traded companies in the casesame or related industries.

The Compensation Committee reviews the information and recommendations provided by our Human Resources Department as well as the performance evaluations presented by our Chief Executive Officer for our other named executive officers and the performance evaluation of the peers noted above, eight are largerChief Executive Officer provided by the Corporate Governance Committee in revenue size than Delta Apparel, Inc.determining the appropriate aggregate and individual compensation levels for the performance year. In contrast, the use of published survey data, with the use of regression equations, allows the data to be size-adjusted appropriately to our revenue size. In addition, published survey data provides for larger data samples and allows for job or role matches based on the duties and responsibilities of the executives. As such, Towers Watson recommendedconducting its review, the Compensation Committee focus primarily onconsiders both the comparisons againstoverall performance results of the general industry published survey dataCompany and use the peer group comparisons as a secondary perspective.overall need of the organization to attract, retain and motivate its executive officers.
Competitive Positioning of Executive Compensation Levels
TheIn fiscal year 2013, the Compensation Committee establishesestablished base salary and annual incentive opportunities and long-term incentive target grants for our named executive officers primarily with reference to the general industry published survey datarecommendations provided by our Human Resources Department based uponon the recommendation of Towers Watson. Theabove-referenced market and peer group comparison data was used as a secondary reference point.company data. Generally, the target annual cash compensation (base salary plus target annual incentive compensation) for our named executive officers is approximately atintended to be within the median levelrange of the general industry published surveymarket data and peer company data, adjusted for each named executive officer's experience level, responsibility, job performance, unique expertise and future growth potential. Executives have the potential to earn significantly higher annual cash compensation when our actual performance significantly exceeds performance goals ortargets and significantly lower annual cash compensation if ourthe Company's performance falls short of targets. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, our named executive officers received less than half, approximately 41%, of their target cash incentive compensation in fiscal year 2013 based on the Company's consolidated performance. Moreover, our Chief Executive Officer forfeited approximately one-quarter of his target equity compensation due to the Company's financial performance goals. in fiscal year 2013 and our other named executive officers forfeited half of their target equity compensation due to the Company's financial performance in fiscal years 2012 and 2013.
Long-term equity incentive target levels for our named executive officers are set to earnwith the intention of earning value at the expected median level of the general industry published surveycompensation market data, adjusted for consideration of expected share price appreciation, overhang, shares available for grant, and dilutionary affect,dilutive effect, with the potential for executive officers to earn higher values when performance goals are exceeded over a defined performance period and lower if Company performance goals are not achieved.
In making decisions with respect to any element of ana named executive officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers the total compensation that may be awarded to the executive, including base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term equity incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee’s goal is to award compensation that is reasonableproperly balanced when all elements of potential compensation are considered.
When considered together, the The Compensation Committee believes the combinedaggregate components of pay provides competitive marketour executive compensation forprogram provide a total compensation level that is sufficient to attract, retain, motivate and reward our named executive officers. In addition, a significant portion

26
Table of compensation is at risk on both a short-term and long-term basis. The at-risk portion should correlate with results that align compensation with creating value for shareholders, and retrospectively, this appears to exist.Contents

Executive Compensation Components
The principal components of compensation for our named executive officers are:
Base salary, which is intended to compensate executives for their primary responsibilities and individual contribution;salary;
Performance-based cash incentives, which are intended to link annual incentive compensation with annual performance achievements and financial results;incentives;
Long-term equity incentives, which are intended to link long-term incentive compensation with the Company's long-term value creation;incentives; and
Other employee benefits provided to all full-time U.S. employees.
Although there is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between specific compensation components, approximately 40%a significant portion of anour named executive officer's annual total target compensation is determined bygenerally intended to be contingent on Company performance as comparedrelative to performance goals established for our annual and long-term incentive plans. We believe this approach reflects our objective of aligning the interests of our executives and shareholders and rewarding our executives based on Company performance without encouraging excessive or unnecessary risk-taking.
Base Salary
We provideBase salary is paid to our executives within cash on a base salary to compensate them for services rendered duringsemi-monthly basis throughout the fiscal year.year and provides a minimum, fixed level of compensation. The base salary for each named executive officer is guided by the relative salary levels for comparable positions in the apparel industry and general industry, as well as the assessed potential of the executive, the individual's scope of responsibility, personal performance, experience and length of service to the Company. Each executive officer's base salary is reviewed annually and generally adjusted to reflect inflation, the Company's financial performance, any change in the executive officer's responsibilities, and the executive officer's overall performance.

26
Table of Contents

The Compensation Committee has determined that, in general, in order to enable the Company to attract, motivate and retain the executive talent important to ournecessary for long-term growth, the compensation strategy should aim to position base salaries competitive with similar positions within both public and private apparel companies. TheWith respect to our named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee reviewsreviewed the recommendations and information provided by Towers Watson regarding executives' base salary levels compared to the general industry and peer group published survey data,our Human Resources Department, along with the Chief Executive Officer's assessment of each executive's individual performance and responsibilities, and knowledge of apparel industry compensation, to determine appropriate compensationbase salary compensation. With respect to our Chief Executive Officer, the recommendations and information provided by our Human Resources Department were reviewed along with the assessment of the Chief Executive Officer's individual performance and responsibilities by the Corporate Governance Committee, to determine appropriate base salary compensation.
Base salaries for each executive. Duringof our named executive officers as of our fiscal year 2011,ended June 29, 2013, are as follows:
Robert W. Humphreys - $760,000
Deborah H. Merrill - $320,000
Martha W. Watson - $285,000
Steven E. Cochran - $410,000
Excluding the larger increase in base salary provided to Mr. Cochran in connection with his January 2013 promotion to the position of President and Chief Operating Officer, which amounted to an approximately 22.4% increase, salary increases were givenin fiscal year 2013 provided to theour named executive officers rangingother than Mr. Cochran ranged from 4.4%approximately 3.2% to 10.7%3.6% to reflect performance, additional experience and responsibilities, and future potential, and changes in market data provided by Towers Watson. Thepotential. These salary increases for the executive officers are, in general,were generally aligned with the increases given to other salaried employees.
Changes in Fiscal Year 20122014
We anticipate base salary increases to thefor our named executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer in fiscal year 20122014 to range from 2.0%approximately 3.1% to 14.5%4.9%. Larger increases areWe do not anticipate any base salary increase for our Chief Executive Officer in unique circumstances where the Towers Watson study suggested certain key employees are under market compensation.fiscal year 2014.
Annual Incentive Compensation
Our compensation philosophy connects our executives' potential annual earnings to the achievement of performance objectives designed to support execution of our business strategies. Ournamed executive officers are eligible for annual incentive compensation (“AIC”) that provides for the payment of cash bonuses pursuant to our Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. Our Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan places a sizable percentage of annual cash compensation at risk and is designed to motivate our named executive officers and rewardother participating salaried employees to achieve and exceed objective annual business performance goals that have been established before or during the first quarter of the fiscal year.year and to reward those employees based on such

27
Table of Contents

achievement. The Compensation Committee certifies that the performance goals have been achieved prior to the payment of any AIC. The Compensation Committee may, at its discretion, adjust the actual annual incentive compensationAIC paid.
Target Value
The overall AIC potentialopportunity for our named executive officers varies depending upon the executive's position, with the target value defined as a certain dollar amount per individual. The Compensation Committee approves the aggregate target values for the plan, as well as the individual target values for all named executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviewsreviewed the compensation recommendations and information provided by Towers Watson regarding executives' target annual incentive compensation (as a percentage of base salary) compared to the general industry published survey data,our Human Resources Department, along with information regarding each executive's individual performance and responsibilities, to determine the appropriate target value for each executive. The fiscal year 20112013 target AIC values for each of our named executive officers were as follows: $625,000
Robert W. Humphreys - $650,000 (or 87%85% of current base salary) for Mr. Humphreys;
Deborah H. Merrill - $150,000 (or 54%47% of current base salary) for Ms. Merrill; $150,000
Martha W. Watson - $100,000 (or 57%35% of current base salary) for Ms. Watson;
Steven E. Cochran - $180,000 (or 55%44% of current base salary) for Mr. Cochran; and $172,500 (or 53% of base salary) for Mr. Spires.
Performance Goals
We do not establish performance criteria based on individual performance for each named executive officer or other members of management, although we do evaluate individual performance when making compensation decisions. Rather, we believe that focusing the executive team as a group on common financial performance goals results in greater long-term success. The named executive officers each have cash incentives and performance-based equity awards conditioned on the achievement of objective financial and operational goals forby the Company as a whole.Company. In addition to the AIC based on theCompany-wide performance, of the Company as a whole, Ms. Watson, Mr. Cochran and Mr. Spires receivedwas eligible to receive a portion of theirhis target value based on the performance of their particular business unit (Junkfood Clothing Company, Deltaour Activewear and M.J. Soffe, LLC, respectively).division in fiscal year 2013.
Under the AIC approved by the Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2011,2013, the performance goals forcomponents of AIC that are based on the consolidated performance of the Company are as a whole arefollows:
ROCE, which represents 75% of the target;
Three-year compounded average earnings per share ("EPS") growth, which accounts for 25% of the target; and
A positive or negative adjustment applied to any amounts earned under the ROCE or EPS growth components based on return on capital employed, defined asthe Company's sales growth or decline in fiscal year 2013.
For fiscal year 2013, the Compensation Committee established the required ROCE to earn the target value at 10%, which is consistent with the rate established for fiscal year 2012. The Committee considered not only the Company’s earnings beforeactual cost of debt, which is well below 10%, in setting the required ROCE to earn the target value, but also the risk-free interest rate environment. A 3% ROCE was required to achieve 25% of the target value and taxesa 21.5% or higher ROCE would have earned the maximum payout of 250% of the target value, with scaled target value achievement for ROCE results between 3% and 21.5% or higher.
One of the Compensation Committee's intentions with respect to the EPS growth component of the AIC structure was for our management team to place more emphasis on interest expense and tax planning to improve net income as a percentage of operating profit in fiscal year 2013. The Compensation Committee established the twelve monthrequired three-year average capital employed. TheEPS growth to earn the target value at 12%, with between 5% and less than 6% average EPS growth achieving up to 70% of the target value, 6% average EPS growth achieving 70% of the target value, and 20% or higher average EPS growth achieving the maximum payout of 250% of the target value, with scaled target value achievement for average EPS growth results between 5% and 20%.
Any incentives earned based on the ROCE and EPS growth components of the AIC structure are then adjusted upward or downward bybased on the sales growth or decline of the Company from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year. For fiscal year 2011, the Compensation Committee established the required return on capital to earn the target value at 10% return on capital employed, which is consistent with the rate established for fiscal year 2010 and above the Company’s actual cost of capital. For 2011, a 10% return on capital employed was required to achieve the target value, with a 3% return on capital employed achieving 25% of the target value and a 25% return on capital employed achieving 300% of the target value. No target value is achieved if the Company’s return on capital employed is less than 3%.
The following table sets forth the performance targets and calculation of the actual cash bonus earned based on the performance of the Company taken as a whole:

27
Table of Contents

Fiscal Year 2011 Annual Cash Bonus Award Components and Results
         
  Performance Range & Payout Percentage    
Performance Metric Threshold 25%Target 100%Maximum 300% Achieved ResultsPercent AchievedPayout Factor
Return on Capital Employed 3%10%25% 11.7%119.4%119.4%
Sales Growth Multiplier     12.0% 14.3%
        133.7%
2013. If minimum performance goals are not met by the Company, there is no guaranteed bonuscash incentive payment. If performance goals are exceeded, there is a maximum bonus payout of 300%250% of the target value. In addition,values; however, our Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan states that no participant in the plan shall receive compensation pursuant to the plan in excess of $1,500,000 during any calendar year.
The following tables set forth the AIC performance targets and calculation of the actual incentive compensation earned in fiscal year 2013 based on the consolidated financial performance of the Company as well as the corresponding individual AIC payments to each named executive officer for fiscal year 2013:

28
Table of Contents

Delta Apparel, Inc. Fiscal Year 2013
Annual Incentive Compensation Components and Results
ROCE (75% of Target Value)
Performance TargetsPerformance Results
    
ROCE LevelsPayout PercentageROCEPayout Factor
< 3%0% of target value5.8%55%
3%25% of target valueSales Growth Multiplier: .01%
10%100% of target value  
21.5%250% of target value (maximum)Total Payout: 55%
3-Year Compounded Average EPS Growth (25% of Target Value)
Performance TargetsPerformance Results
 
  
EPS LevelsPayout PercentageEPSPayout Factor
< 5%0% of target value0%0%
5% to < 6%Up to but < 70% of target value (scaled)Sales Growth Multiplier: n/a
6%70% of target value  
12%100% of target value  
20%250% of target value (maximum)Total Payout: 0%
The fiscal year 2013 AIC payments to each of our named executive officers based on the Company's consolidated performance were as follows:
Robert W. Humphreys - $268,450
Deborah H. Merrill - $61,950
Martha W. Watson - $41,300
Steven E. Cochran - $10,325
In addition to the annual incentive compensation based on the consolidated performance of the Company, as a whole, Ms. Watson, Mr. Cochran and Mr. Spires receivedwas eligible to receive a portion of theirhis target value ($155,000) based on the performance of their particular business unit (Junkfood Clothing Company, Deltaour Activewear and M.J. Soffe, LLC, respectively). Fordivision in fiscal year 2011,2013. Because Mr. Cochran served as President of our Activewear division until his January 23, 2013, promotion and it was anticipated that Mr. Cochran would continue to devote substantial time to the performance goalActivewear division during the remainder of fiscal year 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that it was in the best interests of the Company for Junkfood Clothing Company was based on targeted earnings before interest and taxes. The performance goalsMr. Cochran to continue his participation in the annual cash incentive plan specific to our Activewear division for the Deltaremainder of the fiscal year. The Activewear and M.J. Soffe, LLC business units were based halfdivision cash incentive plan for fiscal year 2013 placed one third of the target value on targetedeach of earnings before interest and taxes and half onas a targetedpercentage of sales ("EBIT"), return on capital employed adjusted to exclude certain assets associated with manufacturing operations ("Adjusted ROCE") with a penalty for excess aged inventory, and sales growth for the individual business unit.Activewear division. There iswas no sales growth or decline adjustment to the business unit bonus plans. Activewear division cash incentive plan.
If minimum performance goals arewere not met by the business unit,Activewear division, there iswas no guaranteed bonus payment.cash incentive payment for Mr. Cochran. If performance goals arewere exceeded, there is nowas a maximum limit;bonus payout of 250% of Mr. Cochran's target value; however, our Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan states that no participant in the plan shall receive compensation pursuant to the plan in excess of $1,500,000 during any calendar year. For
The following tables set forth the performance targets and calculation of the actual incentive compensation earned in fiscal year 2011,2013 based on the payout percentage for thefinancial performance goals of the business units were: 0% for Junkfood Clothing Company; 400.2% for Delta Activewear division as well as the corresponding individual AIC payment to Mr. Cochran:

29
Table of Contents

Activewear Division Fiscal Year 2013
Annual Incentive Compensation Components and 96.0% for M.J. Soffe, LLC.Results
EBIT (1/3 of Target Value)
Performance TargetsPerformance Results
    
EBIT LevelsPayout PercentageEBITPayout Factor
< 2.5%0% of target value5%100%
2.5%50% of target value 
5%100% of target value  
8.75%250% of target value (maximum)Total Payout: 100%
Adjusted ROCE (1/3 of Target Value)
Performance TargetsPerformance Results
    
ROCE LevelsPayout PercentageROCEPayout Factor
< 12.5%0% of target value17.6%152%
12.5%50% of target valueExcess Aged Inventory Adjustment 0%
15%100% of target value  
22.5%250% of target value (maximum)Total Payout: 152%
Sales Growth (1/3 of Target Value)
Performance TargetsPerformance Results
    
Sales Growth LevelsPayout PercentageSales GrowthPayout Factor
< 1.5%0% of target value6.8%103%
1.5%50% of target value 
6.5%100% of target value  
21.5%250% of target value (maximum)Total Payout: 103%
The fiscal year 2013 payment to Mr. Cochran under the Activewear division AIC plan was $183,365.
Changes in Fiscal Year 20122014
For fiscal year 2012, the Compensation Committee made several changes to the AIC structure. The performance goals for AIC that is2014, ROCE, adjusted upward or downward based on the performancesales growth or decline of the Company as a whole were adjusted so that 75% of target is based on return of capital employed (as in prior years), and 25%from fiscal year 2013 to fiscal year 2014, will represent 100% of the AIC opportunity for our named executive officers. The target is based onAIC values for each executive officer will remain the three-year average earnings per share growth. The total is still adjusted based on salessame for fiscal year 2014 with the exception of Mr. Cochran, whose target AIC value will increase or decline as comparedto $250,000. Mr. Cochran will only participate in the AIC plan applicable to the prior fiscal year. With this change, the Compensation Committee expects the management team to put more emphasis on interest expense and tax planning to improve net income as a percentage of operating profit. Adjustments were also made to the individual business unit AIC plans (Junkfood Clothing Company, Delta Activewear and M.J. Soffe, LLC). The newCompany's consolidated performance goals place one third of target value on each of operating margin, return on capital employed (with a penalty for excess aged inventory) and sales growth. Inin fiscal year 2012, there are no guaranteed bonus payments if performance goals are not met under any AIC Plans. If performance goals are exceeded, there is a maximum bonus payout of 250% of target values for all AIC Plans.2014.
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation
Our executivesnamed executive officers receive long-term equity incentive compensation intended to link their compensation to the Company's long-term financial success. Historically, our equity compensation programs consisted of stock option grants under the Delta Apparel Incentive Stock Award Plan ("Stock Award Plan") and the Delta Apparel Stock Option Plan ("Stock Option Plan"). These were designed to provide each executive officer with a significant incentive to manage the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business. On November 11, 2010,business and to link their compensation to the Company's shareholders approvedlong-term financial success. All equity awards are granted by the Compensation Committee with the aim of creating a meaningful opportunity for stock ownership based upon the executive’s current position and level and responsibility, the assessed potential of the executive, the executive’s performance, the executive’s other forms of compensation and total compensation, any other factors that are deemed relevant to accomplish the long-term goals of the Company and, as appropriate, the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer or Human Resources Department.
All stock-based awards are now granted under the Delta Apparel, Inc. 2010 Stock Plan ("2010 Stock Plan"). We will not be granting additional awards under either the Award Plan or the Option Plan; instead, all future stock awards will be granted under the 2010 Stock Plan.
, which was approved by our shareholders on November 11, 2010. Under the 2010 Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee has the authority to determine to whom awards may be granted and the size and type of each award and manner in which such awards will vest. The awards available consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, and cash awards. The 2010 Stock Plan limits the number of shares that may be covered by awards to any participant in a given calendar year and also limits the aggregate awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance stock granted in any given calendar

30
Table of Contents

year. If a participant dies or becomes disabled (as defined in the 2010 Stock Plan) while employed or serving as a director, all unvested awards become fully vested. The Compensation Committee is authorized to establish the terms and conditions of awards granted under the 2010 Stock Plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the 2010 Stock Plan, and to make any other determinations that it deems necessary.
Except for the recent equity awards to our Chief Executive Officer and in other limited instances involving newly hired employees or promotions, the Compensation Committee's current practice is to make regular long-term equity incentive grants every other year that vest on a two-year schedule based on service and/or objective performance criteria. The Compensation Committee did not make any long-term equity awards to named executive officers in fiscal year 2013, instead making such awards in fiscal year 2012 and fiscal year 2014 per regular practice. All long-term equity incentive awards made in fiscal years 2012 and 2014 were made under the 2010 Stock Plan.
Chief Executive Officer
On June 6, 2012, the Company entered into a second amendment to Mr. Humphreys' employment agreement in connection with which Mr. Humphreys received a grant of 156,000 performance units that vest based on future Company performance. One third of such performance units (52,000) were eligible to vest upon the filing of our Form 10-K for fiscal year 2013 based on our one-year average ROCE for that fiscal year and one third of such performance units (52,000) are eligible to vest upon the filing of our Form 10-K for each of our fiscal years 2014 and 2015 based on our one-year average ROCE in each such fiscal year.
The Compensation Committee established the one-year average ROCE for Mr. Humphreys to vest in 100% of the target number of awards granted byshares (52,000) at 7%. Mr. Humphreys vests in 20% of the target number of shares (10,400) if the average ROCE is 3%, 120% of the target number of shares (62,400), which is the maximum number of shares that can be earned under the award, if the average ROCE is 12% or higher, and in none of the shares if the average ROCE is less than 3%. Mr. Humphreys is eligible for pro rata share vesting based on the actual one-year average ROCE being between 3% and 12% (10,400 to 62,400 shares). Mr. Humphreys will receive shares of Company stock equal to one-half of the value of the aggregate number of any vested performance units and a cash payment equal to one-half of the value of the aggregate number of such vested performance units. No tax assistance is provided under this award.
The following table sets forth the performance targets, vesting structure and performance results for the performance units for which Mr. Humphreys was eligible based on the Company's ROCE in fiscal year 2013:
Performance Targets and Results
Chief Executive Officer
TargetsResults
    
ROCE LevelsVesting PercentageROCEShares Vested
< 3%0% of target shares  
3%20% of target shares5.8%76% (39,520)
3% to 7%
20% to 100% of target shares (pro rata)
  
7%100% of target shares  
7% to 12%
100% to 120% of target shares (pro rata)
  
12%120% of target shares (maximum)  
Based on our ROCE of 5.8% in fiscal year 2013, Mr. Humphreys vested in 39,520 performance units (76% of the target amount of 52,000) upon the August 29, 2013, filing of our Form 10-K for the 2013 fiscal year. Pursuant to the terms of the award, Mr. Humphreys received one half of the award in common stock, which is 19,760 shares (less shares net settled for applicable taxes), and a cash payment of $327,028 (less applicable taxes), which is equal to the value of the remaining half of the vested performance units.
Other Named Executive Officers
On July 6, 2011, Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson, and Mr. Cochran were each awarded 13,250 service-based restricted stock units that vest over time and 13,250 performance units that vest based on future Company performance. The service-based restricted stock units vested upon the August 29, 2013, filing of our Form 10-K for the 2013 fiscal year.
Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson, and Mr. Cochran were eligible to vest in the performance units based on our average ROCE for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The Compensation Committee isestablished the two-year average ROCE for Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson, and Mr. Cochran to vest in 100% of the target number of shares (13,250) at a level10%. Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson, and Mr. Cochran were eligible to vest in 50% of the target number of shares (6,625) if the two-year average ROCE was 5%, 150% of the target number of shares (19,875), which was the maximum number of shares that is intended to create a meaningful opportunitycould have been earned under the award, if the two-year average ROCE was 15% or higher, and in none of the shares if the two-year average ROCE was less than 5%. Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson, and Mr. Cochran were

2831
Table of Contents

eligible for stock ownershippro rata share vesting based uponon the executive’s current position, the assessed potential of the executive, the executive’s performance, the executive’s other forms of compensation,actual two-year average ROCE being between 5% and any other factors that are deemed relevant15% (6,625 to accomplish the long-term goals of the Company. In making these grants, the Compensation Committee references competitive long-term incentive data19,875 shares). No tax assistance is provided by Towers Watson.
Stock Award Planunder this award.
The options granted underfollowing table sets forth the Stock Award Plan have an exercise price of $0.01 per share. In addition,performance targets, vesting structure and performance results for the Company provides tax assistanceperformance units for which Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson, and Mr. Cochran were eligible based on the vestingCompany's average ROCE in fiscal years 2012 and 2013:
Performance Targets and Results
Other Named Executive Officers
TargetsResults
    
Two-Year ROCE LevelsVesting PercentageTwo-Year ROCEShares Vested
< 5%0% of target shares  
5%50% of target shares< 5%0%
5% to 10%
50% to 100% of target shares (pro rata)
  
10%100% of target shares  
10% to 15%
100% to 150% of target shares (pro rata)
  
15%150% of target value (maximum)  
Based on our average ROCE for fiscal years 2012 and 2013 being less than 5%, Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson, and Mr. Cochran did not vest in any of the award whereby a cash payment is madethese performance units.
Changes in Fiscal Year 2014
Pursuant to the executive equal to estimated taxes payable by the executive upon the exercise of the option. The Compensation Committee typically granted options under the Stock Award Plan to executivesCompany's regular equity grant practice, at the beginning of aour 2014 fiscal year. Newly hired executive officers may receive a grantyear an aggregate of 30,000 service-based restricted stock options shortly after their hire date based on the long-term grant guidelines approved by the Compensation Committee for that phase of the program. Additional options may also beunit awards and performance unit awards were granted to executive officers in connection with promotions.
As parteach of the negotiationsMs. Merrill and Ms. Watson and an aggregate of Mr. Humphreys’ employment agreement, options40,000 service-based restricted stock unit awards and performance unit awards were granted to Mr. Humphreys atCochran. Half of these awards consist of restricted stock units and half consist of performance units. The applicable performance criteria and targets mirror that of the beginning of fiscal year 2010 under the Stock Award Plan that are service-based. Of the options granted, 50% vested when we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the 2010 fiscal year. The remaining options vested on September 1, 2011, the day we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the 2011 fiscal year. No grants were made to Mr. Humphreys during fiscal year 2011.
At the beginning of fiscal year 2010, options wereabove-described prior awards granted to Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Mr. Spires underCochran except that any vested units will be paid in shares of Company stock equal to one-half of the Stock Award Plan that were both service-based and performance-based options. Thevalue of the aggregate number of options granted by an award is determined by the levelsuch vested units and responsibilitya cash payment equal to one-half of the executive’s position, the executive’s performance, the executive’s total compensation, the assessed potentialvalue of the executive, the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of Human Resources, and any other factors deemed relevant in accomplishing the Company’s long-term goals. In addition to these factors, theaggregate number of options granted to the executive under the plan is evaluated in the context of our historical and anticipated future stock appreciation.
These optionssuch vested on September 1, 2011, the date we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the 2011 fiscal year. Vesting of the performance-based options was based solely on achievement of objective performance goals as determined by the Compensation Committee. Of the total options granted to these executives, 60% vested solely with a service-based element, while the remaining 40% vested based on the achievement of the two-year average return on capital employed. The following table sets forth the performance vesting criteria of the 2010-2011 long-term incentive grant:
Fiscal Year 2010-2011 Performance Vesting Criteria
         
  Performance Range & Payout Percentage    
Performance Metric Threshold 50%Target 100%Maximum 150% Achieved ResultsPercent AchievedVesting Factor
2-Yr Average Return on Capital Employed 5%10%15% 11%110%110%
If a two-year average return on capital of 5% was not met by the Company, none of the performance-based options vested. If performance goals are exceeded, a maximum of 150% of performance-based options would vest. No grants were made to Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson or Mr. Spires during fiscal year 2011.
In October 2010, the Compensation Committee granted awards pursuant to the Award Plan to Mr. Cochran as part of his compensation package upon being hired by Delta Apparel, Inc. Of the total options granted to Mr. Cochran, 60% vested solely with a service-based element, while the remaining 40% vested based upon the same performance criteria as described above for Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Mr. Spires. In addition, upon receiving shareholder approval and filing all necessary documents with the SEC, the Compensation Committee granted stock options pursuant to the 2010 Stock Plan with a strike price equal to the stock price on Mr. Cochran's hire date.
Changes in Fiscal Year 2012
Grants made in fiscal year 2012 were made under the 2010 Stock Plan approved by shareholders in November 2010. For each named executive officer other than the Chief Executive Officer, half of the long-term incentive was granted as Restricted Stock Units and half was granted as Performance Units. Both awards vest when the Company files its Form 10-K for fiscal year 2013. The Performance Units vest upon achievement of return on capital employed targets.units. No tax assistance is provided under these grants.
On August 17, 2011, the Company entered into an amendment to Mr. Humphreys' employment agreement that replaced the 30,000 shares of service grant with tax assistance with 52,000 shares of Performance Units, using return on capital employed as the performance measure. Mr. Humphreys would receive 100% of the grant (52,000 units) at 7% return on capital employed for fiscal

29
Table of Contents

year 2012. At 3% return on capital employed, Mr. Humphreys would receive 20% of the grant (10,400 units), and no units would be earned if return on capital employed is below 3%. The maximum payout would be 120% (62,400 units) if return on capital employed equals or exceeds 12%. No tax assistance will be provided.awards.
Other Employee Benefits
Our named executive officers receive the same employee benefits generally available to all of our full-time U.S employees in the United States, including health insurance, dental insurance, and group life and disability insurance. In addition, executivesour named executive officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan once they meet eligibility requirements. The Company providesWe provide our named executive officers with the same 401(k) match offered to all participating employees of the Company. We do not maintain any deferred compensation or supplemental executive retirement plans.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
The Company doesWe do not provide its executivesour named executive officers with any perquisites or other personal benefits that are not provided to itsour other employees except thatin the Company provides a country club membership to Mr. Spires.United States.
Deductibility of Compensation Expense
Internal Revenue Service rules do not permit us to deduct certain compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1 million, except to the extent such excess constitutes performance-based compensation (as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code). The Compensation Committee considers that its primary goal is to be the design of compensation programs that further the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. To the extent not inconsistentconsistent with that goal, the Compensation Committee attempts to use compensation programs that preserve the tax deductibility of compensation expenses. We believe that the cash bonuses paid to theour employees pursuant to the shareholder approved Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and the performance-based equity grants made pursuant to the Company's 2010 Stock Plan qualify as performance-based compensation exempt from the $1 million deduction limit. The options granted subsequent to November 2001 under the Company’sDelta Apparel Stock Option Plan ("Option Plan") and Delta Apparel Incentive Stock Award Plan ("Award Plan") may not qualify as performance-based compensation, as thethose plans were not approved by Delta Apparel, Inc.’sour shareholders. In fiscal year 2011, approximately $0.5 million2013, all of the compensation paid to Mr. Humphreys was not deductible by the Company for federal income tax purposes. Wepurposes and we believe that in fiscal year 2012, a portion of the2014 all compensation paid to Mr. Humphreys will also not be deductible by the Company for federal income tax purposes.

32
Table of Contents

Employment Agreements
The Company competesWe compete for executive talent and we believe that agreements providing severance protection playsand other protections play an important role in attracting and retaining key executives. Accordingly, the Company hasWe have entered into employment agreements with all named executive officers and other selected senior executives and key managers.
Robert W. Humphreys, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has an employment agreement with Delta Apparel, Inc.the Company dated June 12, 2009, andwhich was amended on August 17, 2011. Steven E. Cochran, President of Delta Activewear, has an employment agreement with Delta Apparel, Inc. dated October 25, 2010. The remaining2011, and amended once again on June 6, 2012. Our other named executive officers listed as follows, are parties to employment agreements with Delta Apparel, Inc. dated December 31, 2009.
Deborah H. Merrill, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Martha M. Watson, Vice2012. Mr. Cochran's employment agreement was amended on January 28, 2013, in connection with his promotion to President and Secretary and President of Junkfood Clothing Company
Kenneth D. Spires, President of M.J. Soffe, LLCChief Operating Officer.
Employment Agreement with Robert W. HumphreysChief Executive Officer
TheMr. Humphreys' agreement provides that Mr. Humphreyshe will receive a base annual salary of at least $690,000,$760,000, subject to upward adjustment at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and confirmed by the full Board of Directors.our independent directors. Mr. Humphreys will participate in the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan with a base of $600,000 during fiscal year 2010, $625,000 during fiscal year 2011, and $650,000 during fiscal year 2012,years 2014 and 2015, with the maximum payout of $1,500,000 for any single fiscal year. The calculation of Mr. Humphreys’ compensation under the Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan will be the same as conducted annually by theour Board of Directors for the other participants in the plan.
Mr. Humphreys will also participate in the 2010 Stock Award Plan. The agreement provides that under
As set forth in the service portion of"Long-Term Incentive Compensation" section, above, in connection with the Plan,first amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Humphreys will receive a grant on June 29, 2009 that provides a two-year award of options exercisable for 30,000received 52,000 shares of Delta Apparel, Inc. stock perperformance units that were eligible to vest based on the Company's attainment of fiscal year upon the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Form 10-K for each of the fiscal years 2010 and 2011. Also under the service portion of the Plan,2012 ROCE targets. Mr. Humphreys willdid not receive an annual grant on June 27, 2011 that provides an annual awardany of options exercisable for 30,000 shares of Delta Apparel, Inc. stock uponthese performance units due to the filing withCompany's ROCE being below the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Form 10-K forminimum threshold in fiscal year 2012. If shares are not available on the date of the award, a cash award will be made to Mr. HumphreysAs also set forth in the amount of"Long-Term Incentive Compensation" section, above, in connection with the value of the award as of the close of

30
Table of Contents

the market on the date of the award. Pursuant to the Plan, the Company shall pay in cash an amount which will be approximately sufficient, after the payment of all applicable federal and state income taxes attributable to such payment, to pay the federal and state income taxes which Mr. Humphreys will incur by virtue of the vesting of such award (or portion thereof) whether received in the form of stock or cash.
On August 17, 2011, the Company entered into ansecond amendment to Mr. Humphreys' employment agreement, he received a grant of 156,000 performance units that replacedare eligible to vest in thirds upon the service-vested optionsfiling of our Form 10-K for 30,000 shares with tax assistance with 52,000 shareseach of Performance Units, using returnour fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015 based on capital employed asour one year average ROCE in the performance measure.applicable fiscal year. In the event that Mr. Humphreys would receive 100%is terminated other than for Cause (as defined in the agreement), and subject to satisfaction of the grant (52,000 units) at 7% return on capital employedapplicable performance criteria, Mr. Humphreys will receive the full award for the fiscal year 2012. At 3% return on capital employed, Mr. Humphreys would receive 20% of the grant (10,400 units), and no units would be earned if return on capital employedin which his employment is below 3%. The maximum payout would be 120% (62,400 units) if return on capital employed equals or exceeds 12%. No tax assistance will be provided.terminated.
Mr. Humphreys will also beis entitled to receive such perquisites as aremay be provided by the Company from time to time to executives of the Company in comparable positions and such other benefits as are customarily available to executives of the Company.
The agreement requires that Mr. Humphreys give the Company 180 days’ prior written notice of his voluntary termination of employment. The Company may terminate Mr. Humphreys’ employment with or without cause upon written notice. If the Company terminates Mr. Humphreys’ employment without cause or Mr. Humphreys terminates his employment because of a material breach of the agreement by the Company, the Company, for a period of 12 months, will continue to pay Mr. Humphreys’ base salary, will pay 100% of his Short-Term Incentive Compensation base amount for the fiscal year in which his employment was terminated, and will continue to provide the life, medical, and disability insurance provided to him prior to termination or, if different, the life, medical, and disability insurance provided to other executives during such 12 month12-month period. In addition, the full award of incentive stock (granted pursuant to the Stock Award Plan) related to the fiscal year in which Mr. Humphreys' employment is terminated will immediately and automatically vest and be exercisable. The agreement provides for 6 months of base salary continuation to Mr. Humphreys’ estate following his death, and provides for base salary and benefits continuation for 6 months following termination of employment because of disability.
If within one year of a Change of Control (as defined in the agreement), Mr. Humphreys terminates his employment for Good Reason (as defined in the agreement) or the Company terminates Mr. Humphreys’ employment for any reason other than Cause (as defined in the agreement), death, or disability, then the Company must pay to Mr. Humphreys (i) an amount equal to his annual base salary in effect on the termination date, (ii) an amount equal to the full amount of the cash Short-Term Incentive Compensation target during the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, (iii) all benefits under the Company’s various welfare and benefit plans for 12 months after the date of termination at levels and rates substantially equal to those applicable to him prior to such termination, and (iv) outplacement assistance.
Mr. Humphreys' agreement contains an IRC Section 280G “golden parachute payment savings clause” that reduces severance payments if the total amount of payments he would receive from the Company would require the Company to report an excess parachute payment.
Upon a termination of Mr. Humphreys’ employment, Mr. Humphreys is generally prohibited for twelve12 months from the date of termination from directly or indirectly competing with the Company by providing to any company that is in a competing business services substantially similar to the services provided by him at the time of termination. A competing business is defined as any business that engages, in whole or in part, in the manufacturing or marketing of activewear apparel in the United States, of America, and Mr. Humphreys’ employment function or affiliation is directly or indirectly in such business of activewear apparel manufacturing or marketing. The agreement also includes non-solicitation provisions whichthat apply to employees, customers and suppliers for a period of two years from expiration of the term of the agreement or termination of employment, as well as non-disclosure provisions, and non-disparagement provisions.
TheMr. Humphreys' agreement continues until the date of the filing with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC of the Company’sour Form 10-K for fiscal year 2012.2015.

33
Table of Contents

Employment Agreements with otherOther Named Executive Officers
The employment agreements with the other named executive officers are identical except for the employees’ initial job titles and initial base salaries set forth below:below. In addition, the non-compete provision in Mr. Cochran's agreement extends for 12 months while the non-compete provisions in each of Ms. Merrill's and Ms. Watson's agreement extends for four months.
Deborah H. Merrill
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
$253,000
Martha M. Watson
Vice President and Secretary
President, Junkfood Clothing Company
$250,000
Steven E. Cochran
President, Delta Activewear
$325,000
Kenneth D. Spires
President, M.J. Soffe, LLC
$310,000
Deborah H. MerrillVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer$320,000
Martha M. WatsonVice President and Chief Human Resources Officer$285,000
Steven E. CochranPresident and Chief Operating Officer$410,000

31
Table of Contents

Each agreement entitles the employee to (i) the initial base salary set forth above (subject to upward adjustment), (ii) participate in the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, and (iii) receive the fringe benefits provided to executives in comparable positions including vacations and life, medical and disability insurance. The agreements all have terms that expire on December 31, 2012.2015.
If the employeeexecutive dies during the term of the agreement, we will continue to pay his or her base salary in effect at the time of death to his or her estate for 6 months. If the employee becomes disabled (as defined in the agreement) during the term and his or her employment is terminated, he or she will continue to receive base salary and benefits for a period of 6 months. If the Company terminates the employee’s employment without cause (as defined in the agreement) or the employee terminates employment because the Company has breached the agreement and in each case no change of control (as defined in the agreement) has occurred, then the employee is entitled to receive base salary and incentive compensation ranging from 3 months base salary and 25% of the Short-Term Incentive Plan award for the most recent full fiscal year if the employee was employed for less than one year or up to 12 months base salary and 100% of the Short-Term Incentive Plan award for the most recent full fiscal year if the employee was employed for three or more years, in all cases paid out in equal monthly payments over the period of base salary continuation. Tocontinuation to the extent permitted under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 409A, the sum of applicable base salary and incentive compensation shall be divided into equal monthly payments and paid to the executive over the applicable payout period, depending on the executive’s years of service at the time of termination.409A. The Company will also make the employee’s COBRA payments for medical insurance for the applicable payout period unless the employee receives reasonably comparable benefits from another employer.
If within one year after a Change of Control (as defined in the agreement), the employee terminates employment for Good Reason (as defined in the agreement) or the Company terminates the employee’s employment for any reason other than Cause (as defined in the agreement), death or disability, then the employee is entitled to receive an amount equal to one year’s base salary for the fiscal year prior to termination plus the cash incentive compensation received by the employee for the most recent fiscal year. The Company must also provide out-placement assistance and continue coverage under the Company’s various welfare and benefit plans in effect at the time of termination for 12 months.
Each agreement contains an IRC Section 280G “golden parachute payment savings clause” that reduces severance payments if the total amount of payments the employee would receive from the Company would require the Company to report an excess parachute payment.
Upon a termination of Ms. Merrill's or Ms. Watson's employment, she is generally prohibited for four months from the date of termination from directly or indirectly competing with the Company by providing to any company that is in a competing business services substantially similar to the services provided by her at the time of termination. A competing business is defined as any business that engages, in whole or in part, in the manufacturing or marketing of activewear apparel in the United States, and Ms. Merrill's or Ms. Watson's employment function or affiliation is directly or indirectly in such business of activewear apparel manufacturing or marketing.
Upon a termination of Mr. Cochran's employment, he is generally prohibited for twelve months from the date of termination from directly or indirectly competing with the Company by providing to any company that is in a competing business services substantially similar to the services provided by him at the time of termination. A competing business is defined as any business that engages, in whole or in part, in the manufacturing or marketing of activewear apparel in the United States, and Mr. Cochran's employment function or affiliation is directly or indirectly in such business of activewear apparel manufacturing or marketing.
The agreements also include non-competition, non-solicitation (with respectprovisions that apply to both employees, customers and customers),suppliers for a period of two years from expiration of the term of the agreement or termination of employment, as well as non-disclosure and non-disparagement provisions.
Compensation Risk Assessment
The Company has assessed the potential risks associated with the Company’s compensation programs, including any risk that would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company, and believes that our compensation program does not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk taking. For a more detailed discussion of the Company's compensation risk assessment please see the "Corporate Governance" section of this Proxy Statement.


3234
Table of Contents

COMPENSATION TABLES
Summary Compensation Table2013 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table provides summary information concerning the compensation paid to or earned by our named executive officers for each of the last three completed fiscal years.
   Non-Equity   Salary
Stock
Awards
Option
Awards
Non-Equity Incentive Plan CompensationAll Other CompensationTotal
  OptionIncentive Plan All Other 
Name and SalaryAwardsCompensation CompensationTotal
Principal PositionYear($)($) (1)($) (2) ($) (3)($)
Name of Principal PositionYear($)($)(1)($)(2)($)(3)($)(4)($)
Robert W. Humphreys2011$720,000
$—
 $835,625
 $7,500
$1,563,125
2013$758,958
—

$—
 $268,450
 $9,258
 $1,036,666
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer2010$690,000
$707,700
 $735,000
 $7,875
$2,140,575
2012$733,125
$3,052,920
(5)$—
 $—
 $7,812
 $3,793,857
(Principal Executive Officer)2009$669,167
$—
 $451,800
 $7,817
$1,128,784
2011$720,000
$—
 $—
 $835,625
 $7,500
 $1,563,125
                
Deborah H. Merrill2011$275,500
$—
 $275,550
(6)$10,340
$561,390
2013$317,083
—

$—
 $61,950
 $10,017
 $389,050
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer &2010$251,083
$235,900
(5)$153,125
 $10,013
$650,121
2012$302,500
$466,400
(6)$—
 $—

$7,134
 $776,034
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)2009$227,500
$—
 $94,125
 $9,100
$330,725
2011$275,500
$—
 $—
 $275,550
(8)$10,340
 $561,390
                
Martha M. Watson2011$265,000
$—
 $133,700
 $6,504
$405,204
2013$283,333
—

$—
 $41,300
 $8,542
 $333,175
Vice President & Secretary2010$250,000
$235,900
(5)$210,750
 $8,396
$705,046
Vice President & Chief Human Resources2012$273,333
$466,400
(6)$—
 $—
 $6,383
 $746,116
Officer2011$265,000
$—
 $—
 $133,700
 $6,504
 $405,204
          
Steven E. Cochran2013$366,250
—

$—
 $193,690
 $84,670
(9)$644,610
President & Chief Operating Officer2012$330,833
$466,400
(6)$—
 $—
 $43,360
(10)$840,593
2009$207,656
$—
 $75,300
 $8,306
$291,262
2011$222,917
$—
 $323,430
(7)$653,735
 $3,792
 $1,203,874
                
Steven E. Cochran2011$222,917
$323,430
(4)$653,735
 $3,792
$1,203,874
President, Delta Activewear2010$—
$—
 $—
 $—
$—
2009$—
$—
 $—
 $—
$—
      
Kenneth D. Spires2011$319,231
$—
 $175,025
 $7,998
$502,254
President, M.J. Soffe, LLC2010$306,154
$235,900
(5)$95,673
 $8,834
$646,561
2009$294,808
$—
 $97,474
 $10,994
$403,276
(1)Amounts do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer in fiscal year 2012. Instead, the amounts shown are the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted share units and performance units computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and which may be earned in ensuing fiscal years based on service and/or the Company's achievement of performance results. The assumptions used for purposes of the valuation of the stock awards are described more fully in Note 12 in our financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2013, as filed with the SEC.
(2)
Amounts do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer.officer in the fiscal year 2011. Instead, the amounts shown are the aggregate grant date fair value of option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.718, and which may be earned in ensuing fiscal years based on service and/or the Company's achievement of performance results. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The grants made pursuant to the Company’s Incentive Stock Award Plan include tax assistance that is paid by the Company. The grant date fair value of these awards is increased by 75%, the approximate value of the tax assistance. The assumptions used in calculating compensation costsfor purposes of the valuation of the options are described more fully in FootnoteNote 12 in the Company’sour financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011June 29, 2013, as filed with the SEC. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for further information on options granted in fiscal year 2011.

(2)(3)
This column represents the amounts earned by the named executive officer in fiscal years 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 pursuant to the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. Additional information regarding the potential threshold, target and maximum payouts underlying the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column is included in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.

(3)(4)This column represents the matching contributions by the Company to the Company’s 401(k) savings plan. The Company’s named executive officers do not receive perquisites that would exceed an aggregate of $10,000 each.

(4)(5)
The amount shown includes the aggregate grant date fair value of both service and performance-basedperformance unit awards, with the performance-based award using the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date, which was assumed to be the target amount. If the amount was calculated assuming the highest level of performance conditions were met, the grant date fair value for grantsthe awards would be $357,366.
$3,663,504.

(5)(6)The amount shown includes the aggregate grant date fair value of both servicerestricted share unit and performance-basedperformance unit awards, with the performance-based awardperformance unit awards using the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date, which was assumed to be the target amount. If the amount was calculated assuming the highest level of performance conditions were met, the grant date fair value for grantsthe awards would be $283,080 each$583,000.
(7)The amount shown includes the aggregate grant date fair value of both service and performance-based awards, with the performance-based awards using the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date, which was assumed to be the target amount. If the amount was calculated assuming the highest level of performance conditions were met, the grant date fair value for Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watsonthe awards would be $357,366.
(8)The amount shown includes a $75,000 bonus for meeting the target date for the corporate refinancing of U.S. and Mr. Spires.Honduran based debt.

(6)    Amount includes $75,000 bonus for meeting target date for corporate refinancing of U.S. and Honduran based debt.





(9)The amount shown includes $73,420 in temporary living and relocation expenses paid to Mr. Cochran in conjunction with a relocation package offered upon his initial employment with the Company.
(10)The amount shown includes $34,493 in temporary living expenses paid to Mr. Cochran in conjunction with a relocation package offered upon his initial employment with the Company.

3335
Table of Contents


GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL YEAR 20112013
The following table provides information regarding grants of cash and stock-based awards made under our Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan Stock Award Plan and 2010 Stock Plan during fiscal year 20112013. The threshold, target and maximum amounts shown in the table represent the amounts to be paid if the Company's performance meets the respective levels of the applicable performance measures. The performance measures are more fully described in the CD&A section of this Proxy Statement. There were no stock-based awards granted to our named executive officers during fiscal year 2013.
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying Option (3)
Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option Award (4)
Closing
Market
Price on
Date of Grant
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option Awards (5)
 
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Securities Underlying OptionsClosing
Market
Price on
Date of Grant
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option Awards
GrantThresholdTargetMaximum ThresholdTargetMaximumGrantThresholdTargetMaximum ThresholdTargetMaximum 
NameDate($)($) (#)($/Sh)($/Sh)($)Date($)($)($)(2) (#) (#)($/Sh)($)
Robert W. Humphreys07/05/10$156,250
$625,000
$1,500,000
(6)—
—
—
—
$—
$—
$—
07/02/12—
$650,000
$1,500,000
(3)—
—
—
 —
—
—
     






 












Deborah H. Merrill07/05/10$37,500
$150,000
$450,000
 —
—
—
—
$—
$—
$—
07/02/12—
150,000
375,000
(3)—
—
—

—
$—
$—
            
Martha M. Watson07/05/10$50,000
$150,000
$1,500,000
(7)—
—
—
—
$—
$—
$—
07/02/12—
$100,000
$250,000
(3)—
—
—
 —
—
—
     






 





 





Steven E. Cochran10/25/10$14,000
$180,000
$1,500,000
(8)—
—
—
—
$—
$—
$—
07/02/12$25,833
$155,000
$387,500
(4)—
—
—

—
$—
$—
10/25/10$—
$—
$—
 —
2,800
4,200
—
$0.01
$13.86
$67,872
07/02/12—
$25,000
$62,500
(3)    
10/25/10$—
$—
$—
 —
—
—
4,200
$0.01
$13.86
$101,808
02/02/11$—
$—
$—
 —
—
—
25,000
$13.86
$13.07
$153,750
     
Kenneth D Spires07/05/10$43,125
$172,500
$1,500,000
(9)—
—
—
—
$—
$—
$—

(1)

The non-equity incentive plan information represents our 20112013 annual incentives under our Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan.


(2)

The equity incentive plan information includes the performance-vesting portions of the stock option grants made under our Stock Award Plan. At the target level, the performance-based portion represents 40% of the total long-term incentive grant.


(3)

This column includes the number of time-vesting options granted under our Stock Award Plan and 2010 Stock Plan.


(4)

The options granted under the Stock Award Plan have an exercise price of $0.01 pursuant to the plan. The options granted under the 2010 Stock Plan would normally have had an exercise price based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. However, due to an administrative error, an option granted on October 25, 2010 under our Stock Option Plan was deemed invalid as the Stock Option Plan had expired. As such, a new option was granted under the 2010 Stock Plan on February 2, 2011 with the same terms, including exercise price, as the option that was deemed invalid.


(5)

The aggregate grant date fair value of the grants was computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The attainment of target level for the performance-based grants was deemed probable at the date of grant and was therefore used to calculate the aggregate grant date fair value.

(6)

The Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan states that no participant in the plan shall receive compensation pursuant to the plan in excess of $1,500,000 during any calendar year.


(7)

Ms. Watson’s cash bonus target amount is $100,000 based on In addition, the performance of2013 annual incentives for both the Company as a whole and $50,000 based on the performance of the Junkfood Clothing business unit. The plan for the Company as a whole has a maximum payout of 300%; however,and the plan based on the business unit does not haveDelta Activewear division include provisions for a maximum. The Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, however, states that no participant in the plan shall receive compensation pursuant to the plan in excessmaximum payout of $1,500,000 during any calendar year.250%.


(8)

(3)		Mr. Cochran's cash bonus target amount is $25,000Amount represents the 2013 annual incentives based on the consolidated performance of the Company as a whole and $155,000Company.
(4)Amount represents the 2013 annual incentives based on the performance of the Delta Activewear business unit. The plan for the Company as a whole has a maximum payout of 300%; however, the plan based on the business unit does not have a maximum. The Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, however, states that no participant in the plan shall receive compensation pursuant to the plan in excess of $1,500,000 during any calendar year.division.


(9)

Mr. Spires’ cash bonus target amount is $25,000 based on the performance of the Company as a whole and $147,500 based on the performance of the M.J. Soffe business unit. The plan for the Company as a whole has a maximum payout of 300%; however, the plan based on the business unit does not have a maximum. The Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, however, states that no participant in the plan shall receive compensation pursuant to the plan in excess of $1,500,000 during any calendar year.


3436
Table of Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 20112013 FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table provides information concerning unexercised stock-based options and unvested unit awards (including restricted share units and performance units) granted to our named executive officers that were outstanding as of July 2, 2011June 29, 2013:.
 Option Awards Stock Awards 
 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options 
Option
Exercise
Price
 
Option
Expiration Date
 
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options



(#)
Option
Exercise
Price




Option
Expiration Date






 Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested

Performance-Based Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
Performance-Based Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

Name Exercisable Unexercisable (#) ($)  Exercisable($) (#)(1)($)(2)(#)($)(3)
Robert W. Humphreys 62,500
 —
 —
 $11.275
 07/05/14 62,500
$11.280
07/05/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 250,000
 —
 —
 $13.350
 07/03/15 250,000
$13.350
07/03/15 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 —
 30,000
(1) —
 $0.010
 09/02/11 —
—
— —
 —
 143,520
(4)$2,023,632
 
                     
Deborah H. Merrill 2,000
 —
 —
 $11.275
 07/05/14 2,000
$11.280
07/05/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 12,000
 —
 —
 $13.350
 07/03/15 12,000
$13.350
07/03/15 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 30,000
 —
 —
 $17.240
 07/03/15 30,000
$17.240
07/03/15 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 26,666
(2) 13,334
(2) —
 $8.300
 02/08/18 40,000
$8.300
02/08/18 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 —
 12,000
(3) 8,800
(3) $0.010
 09/02/11 —
—
— 13,250
 $186,825
 —

$—
 
                     
Martha M. Watson 8,000
 —
 —
 $11.275
 07/05/14 8,000
$11.280
07/05/14 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 56,000
 —
 —
 $13.350
 07/03/15 56,000
$13.350
07/03/15 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 26,666
(2) 13,334
(2) —
 $8.300
 02/08/18 40,000
$8.300
02/08/18 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 —
 12,000
(3) 8,800
(3) $0.010
 09/02/11 —
—
— 13,250
 $186,825
 —
 $—
 
                     
Steven E. McGhee 12,500
(4) 12,500
(4) —
 $13.860
 02/08/18
Steven E. Cochran 25,000
$13.860
02/08/18 —
 —
 —
 —
 
 —
 4,200
(3) 3,080
(3) $0.010
 09/02/11 —
—
— 13,250
 $186,825
 —
 $—
 
                      
Kenneth D. Spires 14,000
  —
  —
 $11.275
 07/05/14
 70,000
  —
  —
 $13.350
 07/03/15
 26,666
(2) 13,334
(2) —
 $8.300
 02/08/18
 —
  12,000
(3) 8,800
(3) $0.010
 09/02/11
(1)These stock awards, granted under the 2010 Stock Plan, are restricted stock units. Each restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one share of Delta Apparel, Inc. common stock on the vesting date, which is the day we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 29, 2013.
(2)The market value is calculated by multiplying the number of restricted share units by $14.10, the closing price of Delta Apparel, Inc.'s common stock on June 28, 2013 (the last trading day prior to the end of our 2013 fiscal year).
(3)The market value is calculated by multiplying the number of performance units Mr. Humphreys was entitled to receive based upon the Company's fiscal year 2013 performance (39,520) and the target levels of the performance units for each of fiscal years 2014 and 2015 (52,000) by $14.10, the closing price of Delta Apparel, Inc.'s common stock on June 28, 2013 (the last trading day prior to the end of our 2013 fiscal year).
(4)In accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Humphreys received an award of 60,000 options granted under the 2010 Stock Award Plan thatof 156,000 performance units with one third of such performance units eligible to vest equally over two years. One-halfupon the filing of the grant vested and was exercised on September 1, 2010, the date the Company filed itsour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 3, 2010. The remaining options vestedeach of our fiscal years 2013, 2014 and were exercised on September 1, 2011, the day the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011.

(2)These options, granted under the Stock Option Plan,2015. With respect to any such performance units that vest, equally over three years. One-thirdMr. Humphreys will receive shares of Delta Apparel, Inc. common stock equal to one-half of the grant vested on July 3, 2010 and July 2, 2011, withvalue of the remaining options vesting on June 30, 2012. These options have a ten-year life from grant date.

(3)These options, granted under the Stock Award Plan, vested and were exercised on September 1, 2011, the day the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011. Theaggregate number of incentive-based options represents 110%such vested performance units and a cash payment equal to one-half of the awards granted basedvalue of the aggregate number of such vested performance units. Based upon the Company's achievementperformance in fiscal year 2013, Mr. Humphreys vested in 39,520 of the performance criteria,target amount of 52,000 shares for which is based on the Company's average return on capital employed for the two years ended July 2, 2011.he was eligible.

37
Table of Contents

(4)In accordance with his offer of employment, Mr. Cochran received an award of 25,000 options granted under the 2010 Stock Plan. Half of the options vested on July 2, 2011, with the remaining options vesting on June 30, 2012. These options expire on February 8, 2018.

FISCAL YEAR 20112013 OPTION EXERCISES
The following table provides information with respect toThere were no stock options exercised by theour named executive officers during fiscal year 20112013:.
 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
Value Realized
on Exercise (1)
Name(#)($)
Robert W. Humphreys30,000
$734,475

35
Table of Contents


(1)The value realized equals the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of exercise, multiplied by the number of shares for which the option was exercised. Amount shown includes the tax assistance included on the awards.



POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The following is a summary setting forth potential severance payments and benefits provided for in each named executive officer's employment agreement or other compensation arrangement, assuming termination of employment or a change in control occurred on July 2, 2011June 29, 2013, the last day of our 20112013 fiscal year. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the events discussed below, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be different. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event, the price of the Company’s common stock and the executive’s age. These benefits are in addition to benefits available generally to salaried employees upon termination.
 
Involuntary
Termination
without Cause
Termination for
Change in
Control
Change in
Control without
Termination
DeathDisability
Executive($)($)($)($)($)
Robert W. Humphreys     
Base Salary$720,000
$720,000
$—
$360,000
$360,000
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation625,000
625,000
—
835,625
835,625
Equity Options and Awards (1)906,150
906,150
906,150
906,150
906,150
Insurance Benefits9,100
9,100
—
—
4,550
Outplacement Services—
5,000
—
—
—
 $2,260,250
$2,265,250
$906,150
$2,101,775
$2,106,325
      
Deborah H. Merrill     
Base Salary$280,000
$280,000
$—
$140,000
$140,000
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation200,550
200,550
—
200,550
200,550
Equity Options and Awards (2)—
723,700
723,700
604,100
604,100
Insurance Benefits2,890
2,890
—
—
1,445
Outplacement Services—
5,000
—
—
—
 $483,440
$1,212,140
$723,700
$944,650
$946,095
      
Martha M. Watson     
Base Salary$265,000
$265,000
$—
$132,500
$132,500
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation133,700
133,700
—
133,700
133,700
Equity Options and Awards (2)—
723,700
843,300
604,100
604,100
Insurance Benefits6,448
6,448
—
—
3,224
Outplacement Services—
5,000
—
—
—
 $405,148
$1,133,848
$843,300
$870,300
$873,524
      
Steven E. Cochran     
Base Salary$81,250
$81,250
$—
$162,500
$162,500
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation163,434
163,434
—
163,434
163,434
Equity Options and Awards (3)—
254,060
254,060
211,435
211,435
Insurance Benefits2,275
2,275
—
—
4,550
Outplacement Services—
5,000
—
—
—
 $246,959
$506,019
$254,060
$537,369
$541,919
      
Kenneth D. Spires     
Base Salary$325,000
$325,000
$—
$162,500
$162,500
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation175,025
175,025
—
175,025
175,025
Equity Options and Awards (2)—
723,700
723,700
604,100
604,100
Insurance Benefits8,400
8,400
—
—
4,200
Outplacement Services—
5,000
—
—
—
 $508,425
$1,237,125
$723,700
$941,625
$945,825

36
Table of Contents


 
Involuntary
Termination
without Cause
Termination for
Change in
Control
Change in
Control without
Termination
DeathDisability
Executive($)($)($)($)($)
Robert W. Humphreys          
Base Salary$760,000
 $760,000
 $—
 $380,000
 $380,000
 
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation650,000
 650,000
 —
 —
 —
 
Equity Options and Awards (1)—
 2,199,600
 2,199,600
 2,199,600
 2,199,600
 
Insurance Benefits9,360
 9,360
 —
 —
 4,680
 
Outplacement Services—
 5,000
 —
 —
 —
 
 $1,419,360
 $3,623,960
 $2,199,600
 $2,579,600
 $2,584,280
 
           
Deborah H. Merrill          
Base Salary$320,000
 $320,000
 $—
 $160,000
 $160,000
 
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
Equity Options and Awards (1)—
 373,650
 373,650
 373,650
 373,650
 
Insurance Benefits2,832
 2,832
 —
 —
 1,416
 
Outplacement Services—
 5,000
 —
 —
 —
 
 $322,832
 $701,482
 $373,650
 $533,650
 $535,066
 
           
Martha M. Watson          
Base Salary$285,000
 $285,000
 $—
 $142,500
 $142,500
 
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
Equity Options and Awards (1)—
 373,650
 373,650
 373,650
 373,650
 
Insurance Benefits8,880
 8,880
 —
 —
 4,440
 
Outplacement Services—
 5,000
 —
 —
 —
 
 $293,880
 $672,530
 $373,650
 $516,150
 $520,590
 
           
Steven E. Cochran          
Base Salary$307,500
 $307,500
 $—
 $167,500
 $167,500
 
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation—
 —
 —
 —
 —
 
Equity Options and Awards (1)—
 373,650
 373,650
 373,650
 373,650
 
Insurance Benefits4,680
 4,680
 —
 —
 4,680
 
Outplacement Services—
 5,000
 —
 —
 —
 
 $312,180
 $690,830
 $373,650
 $541,150
 $545,830
 
(1)
Amount includes value received under the 2010 Stock Award Plan. The value of payments are based upon the closing price of the CompanyCompany's common sharesstock on July 2, 2011 lessJune 28, 2013 (the last trading day prior to the $0.01 exercise price,end of our 2013 fiscal year) multiplied by the number of options. The resulting amount is increased by 75%, the approximate value of the tax assistance paid by the Company related to options exercised on the Stock Award Plan.
awards outstanding.

38
Table of Contents

(2)
Amount includes values received under the Stock Award Plan and Stock Option Plan. The value of payments received from the Stock Award Plan based upon the closing price of the Company common shares on July 2, 2011 less the $0.01 exercise price, multiplied by the number of options. The resulting amount is increased by 75%, the approximate value of the tax assistance paid by the Company related to options exercised on the Stock Award Plan. The value of payments received from the Stock Option Plan are based upon the closing price of the Company common shares on July 2, 2011 less the $8.30 exercise price, multiplied by the number of options.

(3)
Amount includes values received under the Stock Award Plan and Stock Option Plan. The value of payments received from the Stock Award Plan based upon the closing price of the Company common shares on July 2, 2011 less the $0.01 exercise price, multiplied by the number of options. The resulting amount is increased by 75%, the approximate value of the tax assistance paid by the Company related to options exercised on the Stock Award Plan. The value of payments received from the Stock Option Plan are based upon the closing price of the Company common shares on July 2, 2011 less the $13.86 exercise price, multiplied by the number of options.

Payments Made Upon Any Termination
Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer’s employment terminates, the executive is entitled to receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment. Such amounts include:
earned but unpaid salary through the date of termination;
non-equity incentive compensation earned and payable prior to the date of termination;
option grants received which have already vested and are exercisable prior to the date of termination (subject to the terms of the applicable option agreements);
unused vacation pay; and
amounts accrued and vested under the Company’s 401(k) Plan.
Payments Made Upon Retirement
The Company's Stock Option Plan and Stock Award Plan include provisions for vesting based upon retirement.  Pursuant to these plans, the employee must reach the age of 62 in order to qualify for retirement.  None of the named executive officers has reached the age of 62 to receive these retirement benefits as of July 2, 2011.  The Company does not currently offer additional benefits upon retirement other than the benefits available to any employee leaving the Company. The Company's 2010 Stock Plan does not include provisions for vesting based upon retirement.
Payments Made Upon Involuntary Termination for Cause
In the event any named executive officer is terminated for cause (as defined by his or her employment agreement), the executive is not entitled to receive any payments other than those payments identified under the heading “Payments Made Upon Any Termination” above.
Payments Made Upon Involuntary Termination Without Cause
As a result of employment agreements entered into by the Company with the named executive officers, in the event that a named executive officer’s employment is involuntarily terminated without cause, the executive would receive, in addition to the items identified under the heading “Payments Made Upon Any Termination” above:
in the case of Mr. Humphreys, twelve months of base salary continuation and payment of non-equity incentive compensation equal to 100% of the target award for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs. In addition, the full award of optionsperformance units (granted pursuant to the 2010 Stock Award Plan) related to the fiscal year in which Mr. Humphreys’ employment is terminated will immediately and automatically vest and be exercisable;subject to the satisfaction of applicable performance criteria;
in the case of Ms. Merrill and Ms. Watson, and Mr. Spires, twelve months of base salary continuation and payment of non-equity incentive compensation equal to 100% of the award for the most recent full fiscal year prior to termination;
in the case of Mr. Cochran, threenine months of base salary continuation and payment of non-equity incentive compensation equal to 25%75% of the award for the most recent full fiscal year prior to termination; and
continuation of group life, disability and medical insurance coverage for twelve months in the case of Mr. Humphreys, Ms. Merrill, and Ms. Watson, and Mr. Spires, and for threenine months in the case of Mr. Cochran, at levels and rates equal to those immediately prior to termination or, if different, as provided to other executive level employees during such applicable period.

37
Table of Contents

Payments Made Upon a Change in Control
As discussed in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,CD&A, the employment agreements, along with the 2010 Stock Award Plan, contain change in control provisions. The benefits, in addition to the items listed under the heading “Payments Made Upon Any Termination” above, include:
in the case of Mr. Humphreys, if nowhether or not termination results from the change in control, all then-outstanding unvested options will immediatelyperformance criteria shall be deemed achieved at target levels and automatically vestall other terms and be exercisable. Ifconditions met to pay out all performance units. In addition, if termination results from the change in control, twelve months of base salary and payment of non-equity incentive compensation equal to 100% of the target award for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, and the full award of options (granted pursuant to the Stock Award Plan) related to the fiscal year in which Mr. Humphreys’ employment is terminated will immediately and automatically vest and be exercisable;occurs;
in the case of Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Messrs.Mr. Cochran, whether or not termination results from the change in control, all restrictions on restricted stock units will terminate, and Spires, all then-outstanding unvested options will immediatelyperformance criteria shall be deemed achieved at target levels and automatically vestall other terms and be exercisable;
in the case of Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watsonconditions met to pay out all performance units and Messrs. Cochran and Spires,restricted stock units. In addition, if termination results from the change in control, twelve months of base salary and payment of non-equity incentive compensation equal to 100% of the award for the most recent full fiscal year prior to termination; and
in the case of termination resulting from the change in control, Mr. Humphreys, Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Messrs. Cochran and Spireseach named executive officer will receive continuation of group life, disability and medical insurance coverage for twelve months at levels and rates equal to those immediately prior to termination or, if different, as provided to other executive level employees during such applicable period. In addition, outplacement assistance will be provided to the executives.

39
Table of Contents

Payments Made Upon Death or Permanent Disability
In the event of the death or permanent disability of a named executive officer, the executive would receive, in addition to the items listed under the heading “Payments Made Upon Any Termination” above:
in the case of Mr. Humphreys,each named executive officer will receive six months of base salary continuation and the full award of options (granted pursuantall performance criteria shall be deemed achieved at target levels and all other terms and conditions met to the Stock Award Plan) related to the fiscal year in which Mr. Humphreys’ employment is terminated resulting from death pay out all restricted stock units and/or permanent disability will immediately and automatically vest and be exercisable;
in the case of Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Messrs. Cochran and Spires, six months of base salary continuation;
in the case of Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Messrs. Cochran and Spires, the then-outstanding unvested optionsperformance units granted pursuant to the Company’s 2010 Stock Award PlanPlan;
each named executive officer will immediately and automatically vest based on the pro-rata portion of the vesting period prior to the date of death or permanent disability; and
in the case of Mr. Humphreys, Ms. Merrill, Ms. Watson and Messrs. Cochran and Spires,receive continuation of group life, disability and medical insurance coverage for six months at levels and rates equal to those immediately prior to the date of permanent disability or, if different, as provided to other executive level employees during such period.



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with Company management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2013, and this Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:
David T. Peterson (Chairperson)
James A. Cochran
Sam P. Cortez
Robert E. Staton, Sr.



40
Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

In considering the current level of compensation for our non-employee directors and whether any adjustments are appropriate, we have historically obtained data from a number of different sources, including publicly available data for the companies in our industry of comparable size, scope and complexity and market survey data collected by our Human Resources Department. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving changes to the compensation of our non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee engaged in a review of non-employee director compensation in fiscal year 2013 and determined that current compensation levels are appropriate. The Compensation Committee did not engage a compensation consultant to assist in the determination of director compensation in fiscal year 2013.
The Company does not pay any director who is also an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries for his or her service as a director.
InFor fiscal year 20112013, non-employee directors received the following compensation:
$21,00025,000 annual retainer;
a grant of 1,0001,500 shares of Common Stock;
in the case of the Audit Committee, a $5,000$5,000 annual retainer for the committee chairperson and $3,000$3,000 for the committee members;
in the case of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees, a $3,000$3,000 annual retainer for the committee chairpersons and $2,500$2,500 for the committee members;
up to $5,000$5,000 every two-year period for Board of Director education; and
reasonable travel expenses to attend meetings.
The following table summarizes the compensation that the Company’s non-employee directors earned for services as members

38
Table of Contents

of the Board of Directors and any committee of the Board of Directors during fiscal year 20112013:
Name
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
Stock
Awards ($) (1)
Total ($)
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Total

($)
James A. Cochran$25,625
$13,940
$39,565
$30,500
 $24,825
 $55,325
 
Sam P. Cortez$15,750
$12,610
$28,360
$30,500
 $24,825
 $55,325
 
William F. Garrett$23,125
$13,940
$37,065
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood$26,000
$13,940
$39,940
$30,500
 $24,825
 $55,325
 
Dr. G. Jay Gogue$15,750
$12,610
$28,360
$30,000
 $24,825
 $54,825
 
Dr. A. Max Lennon$25,750
$13,940
$39,690
E. Erwin Maddrey, II$26,500
$13,940
$40,440
E. Erwin Maddrey, II (2)$7,625
 $—
 $7,625
 
David T. Peterson$26,375
$13,940
$40,315
$30,500
 $24,825
 $55,325
 
Suzanne B. Rudy$27,250
 $24,825
 $52,075
 
Robert E. Staton, Sr.$25,250
$13,940
$39,190
$30,500
 $24,825
 $55,325
 

(1)
Each current non-employee director was granted 1,000received 1,500 shares of Common Stock which vested upon the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended July 2, 2011. Amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair valueJune 29, 2013.
(2)Mr. Maddrey did not stand for re-election as a director at our November 8, 2012, annual meeting of stock awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.shareholders.
For fiscal year 20122014, we expectdo not anticipate any changes in the compensation forstructure applicable to the Company's non-employee directors to remain the same as fiscal year 2011, except that the annual cash retainer will be increased to $25,000 and the grant of Delta Apparel, Inc. common stock will be increased to 1,500 shares.directors.










41
Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information regarding shares of Common Stockour common stock issuable pursuant to equity compensation plans as of July 2, 2011June 29, 2013:
Number of Securities to
be Issued upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities Reflected
in Column (a))
Plan Category
Number of Securities to
be Issued upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities Reflected
in Column (a))
(a)(b)(c)
(a)(b)(c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders50,000
$13.47
486,333
203,110$3.31588,661
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders1,002,847
$10.32
—
660,500$12.44—
Total1,052,847
$10.47
486,333
863,610$10.29588,661

On November 11, 2010, the Company's shareholders approved the Delta Apparel, Inc.2010 Stock Plan. Upon shareholder approval of the 2010 Stock Plan, ("2010 Stock Plan"). Weno additional awards have been or will not be granting additional awardsgranted under either the Delta Apparel Stock Option Plan ("Option Plan") or the Delta Apparel Incentive Stock Award Plan ("Award Plan");Plan; instead, all future stock awards have and will be granted under the 2010 Stock Plan.
Under the 2010 Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has the authority to determine the employees and directors to whom awards may be granted and the size and type of each award and manner in which such awards will vest. The awards available consist of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock, performance units, and cash awards. The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be delivered under the 2010 Stock Plan is 500,000 plus any shares of common stock subject to outstanding awards under the Option Plan or Award Plan that are subsequently forfeited or terminated for any reason before being exercised. The 2010 Stock Plan limits the number of shares that may be covered by awards to any participant in a given calendar year and also limits the aggregate awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance stock granted in any given calendar year. If a participant dies or becomes disabled (as defined in the 2010 Stock Plan) while employed by or serving as a director, all unvested awards become fully vested. The Compensation Committee is authorized to establish the terms and conditions of awards granted under the 2010 Stock Plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the 2010 Stock Plan, and to make any other determinations that it deems necessary.
Prior to expiration of the Option Plan, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors had the discretion to grant options for up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock to officers and key and middle levelmiddle-level executives for the purchase of our stock at prices not less than fifty percent of the fair market value of the shares on the dates of grant, with an exercise term (as determined by the

39
Table of Contents

Compensation Committee) not to exceed 10 years.
Under the Award Plan, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors had the discretion to grant awards for up to an aggregate maximum of 800,000 shares of our common stock. The Award Plan authorized the Compensation Committee to grant to our officers and key and middle level executives rights to acquire shares at a cash purchase price of $0.01 per share. The Award Plan contained provisions for cash payments equal to the taxes due when the shares vest.





40
Table of Contents

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications, independence and performance of the independent accountants and the performance of the internal audit function. The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors who meet independence, experience and other qualification requirements of the NYSE Amex Company Guide and SEC requirements. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Dr. G. Jay Gogue qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC.
Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, including the Company's internal control over financial reporting, and for the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our independent accountants are responsible for expressing an opinion on the financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, based on an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. The Committee's responsibility is to oversee and review these processes. The Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made by management and the independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:
1.
The Audit Committee appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2011.
2.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the year ended July 2, 2011 and the internal controls over financial reporting as of July 2, 2011 with the Company’s management.
3.The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (Communication with Audit Committees).
4.The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as amended (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from the Company.
In determining Ernst & Young’s independence, the Committee also considered whether the provision of any of the non-audit services provided to the Company is compatible with maintaining their independence. The Committee received regular updates on Ernst & Young’s fees and the scope of audit and non-audit services it provided. All such services were provided consistent with applicable rules and our pre-approval policies and procedures.
Based on our discussions with management, our internal auditors and Ernst & Young, and our review of the audited financial statements, including the representations of management and Ernst & Young with respect thereto, and subject in all cases to the limitations on our role and responsibilities referred to above and set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company's audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011 be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Committee also approved, subject to shareholder ratification, the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2012.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Dr. A. Max Lennon (Chairperson)
James A. Cochran
Dr. Elizabeth J. Gatewood
E. Erwin Maddrey, II
David T. Peterson


4142
Table of Contents

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The 20112013 Annual Report contains our fiscal year 20112013 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, including financial statements and financial statement schedules,schedule, but excluding exhibits. The Company will furnish to any shareholder, without charge, a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011June 29, 2013, as filed with the SEC, upon written request to Delta Apparel, Inc., 322 S. Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601, Attention: Deborah H. Merrill, Chief Financial Officer.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ MarthaJustin M. WatsonGrow
MarthaJustin M. WatsonGrow
Secretary

Greenville, South Carolina
September 28, 201123, 2013


42
Table of Contents


43
Table of Contents




44
Table of Contents